Suppr超能文献

一氧化氮在大鼠十字迷宫情绪学习中的作用。

The role of nitric oxide in the emotional learning of rats in the plus-maze.

作者信息

Da Cunha I C, José R F, Orlandi Pereira L, Pimenta J A, Oliveira de Souza I A, Reiser R, Moreno H, Marino Neto J, Paschoalini M A, Faria M S

机构信息

Department of Physiological Sciences, Centre of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88.040-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2005 Mar 16;84(3):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.12.005.

Abstract

The present study evaluated the role of nitric oxide (NO) in the transfer latency (TL) paradigm in the elevated plus-maze. Male Wistar rats received i.p. injections of either 0.9% Saline, N(omega) Nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester (L-NAME, an inhibitor of NO synthesis), d-NAME (inert isomer), scopolamine (SCO, antagonist of muscarinic receptors), or MK-801 (antagonist of NMDA receptors) and, after 30 min, were submitted to TL procedure. In an independent experiment, the ability of the same L-NAME treatments in changing the arterial pressure and blood glucose level (BGL) was evaluated in conscious rats. The treatment with SCO (1 mg kg(-1)), MK-801 (0.15 mg kg(-1)) and L-NAME (10 and 50 mg kg(-1)), but not with D-NAME, impaired the TL learning. The L-NAME-induced TL deficit was counteracted by L-ARG (100 and 200 mg kg(-1)), while the co-administration of sub-effective doses of L-NAME and MK-801 failed to impair the TL learning. The L-NAME (50 mg kg(-1)) treatment failed to alter the BGL. All treatments with L-NAME induced hypertension, but the rats treated with L-NAME (5 mg kg(-1)) were still able to learn the TL task. The data indicate that the TL deficit induced by L-NAME (10 and 50 mg kg(-1)) is not due to either hypertension or changes in the BGL. It is also possible to establish that NO production is important for emotional learning underlying the TL procedure in rats.

摘要

本研究评估了一氧化氮(NO)在高架十字迷宫中转移潜伏期(TL)范式中的作用。雄性Wistar大鼠腹腔注射0.9%生理盐水、N(ω)-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME,一种NO合成抑制剂)、d-NAME(惰性异构体)、东莨菪碱(SCO,毒蕈碱受体拮抗剂)或MK-801(NMDA受体拮抗剂),30分钟后进行TL实验。在一项独立实验中,评估了相同L-NAME处理对清醒大鼠动脉血压和血糖水平(BGL)的影响。SCO(1mg/kg)、MK-801(0.15mg/kg)和L-NAME(10和50mg/kg)处理(而非D-NAME处理)损害了TL学习。L-ARG(100和200mg/kg)可抵消L-NAME诱导的TL缺陷,而联合使用次有效剂量的L-NAME和MK-801未能损害TL学习。L-NAME(50mg/kg)处理未能改变BGL。所有L-NAME处理均导致高血压,但L-NAME(5mg/kg)处理的大鼠仍能学会TL任务。数据表明,L-NAME(10和50mg/kg)诱导的TL缺陷并非由高血压或BGL变化所致。也可以确定,NO生成对大鼠TL实验背后的情绪学习很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验