Suppr超能文献

提高多项选择题的公平性:文献综述

Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.

作者信息

McCoubrie Paul

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2004 Dec;26(8):709-12. doi: 10.1080/01421590400013495.

Abstract

The ubiquity of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) results from their efficiency and hence reliability. Cognitive knowledge assessed by MCQ predicts and correlates well with overall competence and performance but examinees and examiners alike frequently perceive MCQ-based testing as 'unfair'. Fairness is akin to defensibility and is an increasingly important concept in testing. It is dependent on psychometric adequacy, diligence of construction, attention to consequential validity and appropriate standard setting. There is a wealth of evidence that extended matching questions are the fairest format but MCQs should always be combined with practical assessments, as written testing emphasizes learning from written sources.

摘要

多项选择题(MCQs)的广泛使用源于其效率以及由此带来的可靠性。通过多项选择题评估的认知知识能够很好地预测整体能力和表现,并与之相关联,但考生和考官都常常认为基于多项选择题的测试“不公平”。公平类似于可辩护性,是测试中一个日益重要的概念。它取决于心理测量的充分性、出题的严谨性、对结果效度的关注以及适当的标准设定。有大量证据表明,扩展匹配题是最公平的题型,但多项选择题应始终与实践评估相结合,因为书面测试强调从书面资料中学习。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验