Jansson Anna, Arneborn Malin, Skärlund Katarina, Ekdahl Karl
Department of Epidemiology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI), Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36(11-12):865-72. doi: 10.1080/00365540410025348.
To prepare for a new communicable disease act in Sweden, we performed an in-depth analysis of the performance of the present notification system (1998--2002). Four diseases were selected for analysis (meningococcal infection, salmonellosis, infection with penicillin-resistant pneumococci and tularaemia). Each step in the double notification flow (clinical and laboratory notifications) was studied and paper-based and electronic notifications compared. More than 15 possible single dates in the notification flows were analysed for 27,000 cases. The shortest notification flows (from date of sample collection to when the first notification was received at SMI--clinical or laboratory notification) were seen for meningococcal infections and salmonellosis (median 7 d) and the longest for tularaemia (11 d). Laboratory notifications were faster than clinical notifications, and electronic reporting 1.5-1.7 times faster than paper notifications. Further gains should be expected from the new electronic reporting system (SmiNet2), which will allow also clinical reporting electronically over the internet.
为筹备瑞典一项新的传染病法案,我们对现行通报系统(1998 - 2002年)的运行情况进行了深入分析。选取了四种疾病进行分析(脑膜炎球菌感染、沙门氏菌病、耐青霉素肺炎球菌感染和兔热病)。对双重通报流程(临床和实验室通报)的每个环节进行了研究,并比较了纸质通报和电子通报。针对27000例病例分析了通报流程中超过15个可能的单一日期。脑膜炎球菌感染和沙门氏菌病的通报流程最短(从样本采集日期到瑞典传染病监控中心收到首次通报——临床或实验室通报,中位数为7天),兔热病的最长(11天)。实验室通报比临床通报更快,电子报告比纸质通报快1.5至1.7倍。新的电子报告系统(SmiNet2)有望带来进一步的改进,该系统还将允许通过互联网进行临床电子报告。