Jansson A, Arneborn M, Ekdahl K
Department of Epidemiology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI), Stockholm, Sweden.
Epidemiol Infect. 2005 Jun;133(3):401-7. doi: 10.1017/s0950268804003632.
To assess the sensitivity of the Swedish surveillance system, four notifiable communicable diseases in Sweden were examined during 1998-2002 with the two-sources capture-recapture method, based on parallel clinical and laboratory notifications. The sensitivity (proportion of diagnosed diseases actually being notified) was highest for salmonellosis (99.9%), followed by meningococcal infection (98.7%), and tularaemia (98.5%). For penicillin-resistant pneumococci, introduced as a notifiable disease in 1996, the overall sensitivity was 93.4%--increasing from 86.5% in 1998 to 98.5% in 2002. The system benefited from parallel reporting, with a sensitivity of clinical and laboratory notifications alone (all diseases combined) of 91.6% and 95.9% respectively. The sensitivity of both clinical and laboratory notifications was markedly higher in counties using the national electronic reporting system, SmiNet. Thus, sensitivity was higher for diseases with a long tradition of reporting, and there is a run-in period after a new disease becomes notifiable.
为评估瑞典监测系统的敏感性,1998年至2002年期间,采用双源捕获-再捕获法,基于临床和实验室平行报告,对瑞典四种应报告的传染病进行了检查。沙门氏菌病的敏感性(实际报告的确诊疾病比例)最高(99.9%),其次是脑膜炎球菌感染(98.7%)和兔热病(98.5%)。1996年作为应报告疾病引入的耐青霉素肺炎球菌,总体敏感性为93.4%,从1998年的86.5%增至2002年的98.5%。该系统受益于平行报告,临床报告和实验室报告单独的敏感性(所有疾病合计)分别为91.6%和95.9%。在使用国家电子报告系统SmiNet的县,临床报告和实验室报告的敏感性均明显更高。因此,报告历史悠久的疾病敏感性更高,新疾病成为应报告疾病后有一个磨合期。