Weiss Roger D, Jaffee William B, de Menil Victoria P, Cogley Catherine B
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA.
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2004 Nov-Dec;12(6):339-50. doi: 10.1080/10673220490905723.
Although group therapy is the most prevalent treatment modality for substance use disorders, an up-to-date review of treatment outcome literature does not exist. A search of the literature yielded 24 treatment outcome studies comparing group therapy to other treatment conditions. These studies fell into one of six research design categories: (1) group therapy versus no group therapy; (2) group therapy versus individual therapy; (3) group therapy plus individual therapy versus group therapy alone; (4) group therapy plus individual therapy versus individual therapy alone; (5) group therapy versus another group therapy with different content or theoretical orientation; and (6) more group therapy versus less group therapy. In general, treatment outcome studies did not demonstrate differences between group and individual modalities, and no single type of group therapy reliably demonstrated greater efficacy than others. Unique methodological and logistical hurdles encountered in research on group therapy for substance use disorders, as well as considerations for future research, are also discussed.
尽管团体治疗是物质使用障碍最普遍的治疗方式,但目前尚无关于治疗结果文献的最新综述。对文献的检索产生了24项将团体治疗与其他治疗条件进行比较的治疗结果研究。这些研究分为六个研究设计类别之一:(1)团体治疗与无团体治疗;(2)团体治疗与个体治疗;(3)团体治疗加个体治疗与单独的团体治疗;(4)团体治疗加个体治疗与单独的个体治疗;(5)团体治疗与另一种内容或理论取向不同的团体治疗;(6)更多的团体治疗与更少的团体治疗。总体而言,治疗结果研究并未显示团体治疗和个体治疗方式之间存在差异,也没有单一类型的团体治疗能可靠地证明比其他治疗更有效。文中还讨论了物质使用障碍团体治疗研究中遇到的独特方法学和后勤障碍,以及对未来研究的考虑因素。