Fingerhut A, Oberlin P, Cotte J L, Aziz L, Etienne J C, Vinson-Bonnet B, Aubert J D, Rea S
Department of Visceral Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal, Poissy, France.
Br J Surg. 1992 Apr;79(4):325-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790414.
Forty-nine adults underwent surgery for splenic injury: 17 (group 1) had salvage with a splenic mesh, seven (group 2) underwent other preservation techniques, and 25 (group 3) underwent splenectomy. There were six, zero and 11 hilar lesions in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Seven of 15 associated lesions involved the digestive tract. There was no significant difference in transfusion requirements, length of operation or postoperative complications. One patient died in each of groups 1 and 2, and eight in group 3. Secondary splenectomy was performed once in groups 1 and 2. The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the preservation groups (1 and 2) than in group 3. Splenic preservation was feasible in 24 of 49 adults with splenic injury requiring surgery. The splenic mesh wrap is safe and reliable, and allows splenic salvage even with hilar injury.
49名成年人接受了脾损伤手术:17人(第1组)采用脾网片进行保脾治疗,7人(第2组)采用其他保脾技术,25人(第3组)接受了脾切除术。第1、2和3组分别有6处、0处和11处脾门损伤。15处相关损伤中有7处累及消化道。输血需求、手术时长或术后并发症方面无显著差异。第1组和第2组各有1例患者死亡,第3组有8例患者死亡。第1组和第2组各进行了1次二次脾切除术。保脾组(第1组和第2组)的住院时间比第3组短。49例需要手术治疗的脾损伤成年患者中,24例可行脾保留。脾网片包裹安全可靠,即使存在脾门损伤也能实现脾保留。