Suppr超能文献

报告的破伤风疫苗接种史不可靠。

Unreliability of reported tetanus vaccination histories.

作者信息

Gindi Michael, Oravitz Peter, Sexton Regina, Shpak Mikhail, Eisenhart Anita

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint Barnabas Hospital, Bronx, NY 10457, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;23(2):120-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.03.015.

Abstract

Our study questioned the reliability of patients' reported tetanus immunization histories. One thousand patients at an urban teaching hospital were queried regarding their tetanus immunization status. Of the 377 patients who initially asserted having had a tetanus vaccine in the last 5 years, 98 (26%) were confirmed, either by further history taking or chart review, not to have received tetanus immunization. It appears that there is a sizeable percentage of patients who falsely report their tetanus immunization status.

摘要

我们的研究对患者报告的破伤风免疫史的可靠性提出了质疑。一家城市教学医院的1000名患者被询问了他们的破伤风免疫状况。在最初声称在过去5年内接种过破伤风疫苗的377名患者中,经进一步询问病史或查阅病历,有98人(26%)被证实未接种过破伤风疫苗。看来有相当比例的患者会错误报告他们的破伤风免疫状况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验