文献检索
文档翻译
深度研究
Zotero 插件
邀请有礼
套餐&价格
历史记录
Suppr
超能文献
应用&插件
Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
出版信息
Wests Atl Report. 2001;782:807-62.
PMID:
15765579
Abstract
摘要
文献AI研究员
20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。
立即体验
用中文搜PubMed
大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎
马上搜索
文档翻译
学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。
立即体验
应用&插件
Zotero 插件
浏览器插件
Mac 客户端
Windows 客户端
微信小程序
定价
高级版会员
购买积分包
购买API积分包
服务
文献检索
文档翻译
深度研究
API 文档
关于我们
关于 Suppr
公司介绍
联系我们
用户协议
隐私条款
关注我们
Suppr 超能文献
核心技术专利:
CN118964589B
侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1
Suppr @ 2025
相似文献
1
Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
Wests Atl Report. 2001;782:807-62.
2
Group benefit and protection of pediatric research subjects: Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger and the Lead Abatement Study.
Account Res. 2002 Jul-Dec;9(3-4):177-92. doi: 10.1080/08989620214682.
3
Parental consent for children's participation in biomedical research: the ethical, regulatory, and judicial framework of Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc.
J Health Care Law Policy. 2002;6(1):169-93.
4
The Kennedy Krieger case: judicial anger and the research enterprise.
J Health Care Law Policy. 2002;6(1):148-68.
5
Whose duty is it anyway?: the Kennedy Krieger opinion and its implications for public health research.
J Health Care Law Policy. 2002;6(1):109-47.
6
Nontherapeutic research, minimal risk, and the Kennedy Krieger lead abatement study.
IRB. 2001 Nov-Dec;23(6):7-11.
7
Risk standards for pediatric research: rethinking the Grimes ruling.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Jun;14(2):187-98. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0024.
8
U.S. investigating Johns Hopkins study of lead paint hazard.
N Y Times Web. 2001 Aug 24:A11.
9
Appropriate risk exposure in environmental health research. The Kennedy-Krieger lead abatement study.
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2002 Jul-Aug;24(4):445-9. doi: 10.1016/s0892-0362(02)00236-2.
10
Ethically questionable research with children: the Kennedy Krieger Lead Abatement Study.
Account Res. 2002 Jul-Dec;9(3-4):167-75. doi: 10.1080/08989620214684.
引用本文的文献
1
Licensing competent children to assist institutional review boards.
J Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1136/jme-2024-109910.
2
Is There a Doctor in the House?
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Aug;23(8):47-50. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2217148.
3
Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:393-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
4
Acceptable Risks in Pediatric Research: Views of the US Public.
Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-052687.
5
Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1):69-86. doi: 10.1177/1073110520916996.
6
Knowledge and practice of informed consent by physiotherapists and therapy assistants in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.
S Afr J Physiother. 2019 Aug 12;75(1):1330. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v75i1.1330. eCollection 2019.
7
Reporting to parents on children's exposures to asthma triggers in low-income and public housing, an interview-based case study of ethics, environmental literacy, individual action, and public health benefits.
Environ Health. 2018 May 21;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0395-9.
8
Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings.
Genome Res. 2014 May;24(5):719-23. doi: 10.1101/gr.170514.113. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
9
Environmental Health Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethical Issues.
Environ Health Insights. 2008 Jul 14;2008(2):27-34. doi: 10.4137/EHI.S892.
10
The clinical investigator-subject relationship: a contextual approach.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 Dec 3;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-4-16.