Law School and Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; email:
Genomes2People Research Program, Harvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, Broad Institute, and Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; email:
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:393-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
Genome sequencing is increasingly used in research and integrated into clinical care. In the research domain, large-scale analyses, including whole genome sequencing with variant interpretation and curation, virtually guarantee identification of variants that are pathogenic or likely pathogenic and actionable. Multiple guidelines recommend that findings associated with actionable conditions be offered to research participants in order to demonstrate respect for autonomy, reciprocity, and participant interests in health and privacy. Some recommendations go further and support offering a wider range of findings, including those that are not immediately actionable. In addition, entities covered by the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) may be required to provide a participant's raw genomic data on request. Despite these widely endorsed guidelines and requirements, the implementation of return of genomic results and data by researchers remains uneven. This article analyzes the ethical and legal foundations for researcher duties to offer adult participants their interpreted results and raw data as the new normal in genomic research.
基因组测序越来越多地用于研究并整合到临床护理中。在研究领域,大规模分析,包括全基因组测序和变体解释和管理,几乎可以保证鉴定出致病性或可能致病性和可操作性的变体。多项指南建议向研究参与者提供与可操作性条件相关的发现,以展示对自主性、互惠性以及参与者在健康和隐私方面的利益的尊重。一些建议更进一步,支持提供更广泛的发现,包括那些目前不可操作的发现。此外,受美国《健康保险便携性和责任法案》(HIPAA)覆盖的实体可能被要求根据请求提供参与者的原始基因组数据。尽管有这些广泛认可的准则和要求,但研究人员实施基因组结果和数据的回报仍然参差不齐。本文分析了研究人员提供解释结果和原始数据的义务的伦理和法律基础,作为基因组研究的新常态。