Lindbaek Morten, Høiby Ernst Arne, Lermark Gro, Steinsholt Inger Marie, Hjortdahl Per
Department of General Practice and Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Dec;22(4):233-8. doi: 10.1080/02813430410006675.
To compare an antigen detection test (GAS antigen test) with the results from combinations of two various bacteriological test media in general practice patients with sore throat. Furthermore to assess the diagnostic properties of the chosen GAS antigen test and to compare semi-quantitative results of this test with the bacterial load found in the throat culture.
Two Norwegian general practices in Stokke and Kongsberg communities.
306 patients with sore throat lasting less than 7 days; 244 were adults, 62 were children under 10 years old, mean age 23.9 years (SD 15.0), 40% were men.
Results from GAS antigen test, and distribution of bacteriological findings in throat cultures, compared with the results of our GAS antigen test; semi-quantitative results of the GAS antigen test compared with the bacterial load by culture.
In the primary culture 110 patients harboured group A streptococci (GAS) infection, while the second culture identified another 17, giving a total of 127 patients. Some 33 patients harboured large-colony groups C and G. The GAS antigen test used had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 95% regarding GAS when compared with the two cultures. We found a significant correlation between the bacterial loads by culture and the semi-quantitative results of the GAS antigen test.
By using a second, different set of bacteriological media, we identified an additional 17 patients with GAS infections. This raises the question of validity of frequently used reference standards in studies related to streptococcal infections. Compared with the combined results of the two throat cultures, the GAS antigen test used showed high sensitivity and specificity. Semi-quantitative evaluations of the rapid immunological test may also be of clinical value.
在患有咽喉痛的全科医疗患者中,将一种抗原检测试验(A群链球菌抗原检测)与两种不同细菌学检测培养基组合的结果进行比较。此外,评估所选A群链球菌抗原检测的诊断特性,并将该检测的半定量结果与咽喉培养物中发现的细菌载量进行比较。
挪威斯托克和孔斯贝格社区的两家全科医疗机构。
306例咽喉痛持续时间少于7天的患者;244例为成年人,62例为10岁以下儿童,平均年龄23.9岁(标准差15.0),40%为男性。
A群链球菌抗原检测的结果,以及咽喉培养物中细菌学检查结果的分布,并与我们的A群链球菌抗原检测结果进行比较;将A群链球菌抗原检测的半定量结果与培养的细菌载量进行比较。
在初次培养中,110例患者感染了A群链球菌(A群链球菌),而第二次培养又发现了17例,共有127例患者。约33例患者感染了C群和G群大菌落。与两种培养结果相比,所使用的A群链球菌抗原检测对A群链球菌的敏感性为97%,特异性为95%。我们发现培养的细菌载量与A群链球菌抗原检测的半定量结果之间存在显著相关性。
通过使用另一组不同的细菌学培养基,我们又发现了17例A群链球菌感染患者。这就引发了在与链球菌感染相关的研究中常用参考标准的有效性问题。与两种咽喉培养结果相结合相比,所使用的A群链球菌抗原检测显示出高敏感性和特异性。快速免疫检测的半定量评估也可能具有临床价值。