• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受活化蛋白C治疗的严重脓毒症患者医院死亡率的预测因素。

Predictors of hospital mortality for patients with severe sepsis treated with Drotrecogin alfa (activated).

作者信息

Micek Scott T, Isakow Warren, Shannon William, Kollef Marin H

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2005 Jan;25(1):26-34. doi: 10.1592/phco.25.1.26.55615.

DOI:10.1592/phco.25.1.26.55615
PMID:15767217
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To identify predictors of hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis who were treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated).

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

A 1400-bed academic medical center.

PATIENTS

One hundred two patients treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) for severe sepsis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

To identify potential risk factors for hospital mortality, the main outcome evaluated, all patients who received drotrecogin alfa (activated) were segregated according to hospital survival. The following characteristics were recorded: age, sex, weight, surgical or nonsurgical, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, number of acquired organ-system derangements, mechanical ventilation, use of vasopressors or dobutamine, patient location 24 hours before receiving drotrecogin alfa (activated), source of infection, microbiologically positive culture, and other process-of-care variables. Of the 102 patients, 43 (42.2%) died during their hospitalization. Potential predictors of hospital mortality identified by univariate analysis included greater APACHE II scores, administration of vasopressin or dobutamine, number of acquired organ-system derangements, time to treatment with drotrecogin alfa (activated), intravenous fluid administered before receiving vasopressors or drotrecogin alfa (activated), number of red blood cell transfusions, and administration of inappropriate initial antimicrobial treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that vasopressin administration (odds ratio [OR] 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-7.10), number of acquired organ-system derangements (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.59-3.31), and administration of inappropriate initial antimicrobial treatment (OR 15.5, 95% CI 6.78-35.6) were independently associated with hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Number of acquired organ-system derangements, vasopressin administration, and treatment with an inappropriate initial antimicrobial regimen are independently associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality among patients treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) for severe sepsis. These findings suggest that other specific medical interventions may increase survival in this patient population.

摘要

研究目的

确定接受活化蛋白C治疗的严重脓毒症患者的医院死亡率预测因素。

设计

前瞻性观察性队列研究。

地点

一家拥有1400张床位的学术医疗中心。

患者

102例接受活化蛋白C治疗严重脓毒症的患者。

测量指标及主要结果

为确定医院死亡率的潜在危险因素,即所评估的主要结局,所有接受活化蛋白C治疗的患者按住院存活情况进行分类。记录了以下特征:年龄、性别、体重、手术或非手术情况、急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分、获得性器官系统功能紊乱的数量、机械通气、血管升压药或多巴酚丁胺的使用、接受活化蛋白C治疗前24小时的患者所在位置、感染源、微生物学阳性培养结果以及其他治疗过程变量。102例患者中,43例(42.2%)在住院期间死亡。单因素分析确定的医院死亡率潜在预测因素包括更高的APACHE II评分、血管升压素或多巴酚丁胺的使用、获得性器官系统功能紊乱的数量、接受活化蛋白C治疗的时间、在接受血管升压药或活化蛋白C治疗前输注的静脉液体量、红细胞输注次数以及不恰当的初始抗菌治疗。多因素分析显示,血管升压素的使用(比值比[OR] 3.72,95%置信区间[CI] 1.95 - 7.10)、获得性器官系统功能紊乱的数量(OR 2.30,95% CI 1.59 - 3.31)以及不恰当的初始抗菌治疗(OR 15.5,95% CI 6.78 - 35.6)与医院死亡率独立相关。

结论

获得性器官系统功能紊乱的数量、血管升压素的使用以及不恰当的初始抗菌治疗方案与接受活化蛋白C治疗严重脓毒症患者的医院死亡风险增加独立相关。这些发现提示其他特定的医学干预措施可能提高该患者群体的生存率。

相似文献

1
Predictors of hospital mortality for patients with severe sepsis treated with Drotrecogin alfa (activated).接受活化蛋白C治疗的严重脓毒症患者医院死亡率的预测因素。
Pharmacotherapy. 2005 Jan;25(1):26-34. doi: 10.1592/phco.25.1.26.55615.
2
Drotrecogin alfa (activated): diffusion from clinical trials to clinical practice.重组活化蛋白C:从临床试验到临床实践的推广
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Mar;25(3):211-6. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507002992. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
3
Extended evaluation of recombinant human activated protein C United States Trial (ENHANCE US): a single-arm, phase 3B, multicenter study of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis.重组人活化蛋白C美国试验(ENHANCE US)的扩展评估:一项关于重组人活化蛋白C(活性)用于严重脓毒症的单臂、3B期、多中心研究。
Chest. 2004 Jun;125(6):2206-16. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.6.2206.
4
Drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration across clinically important subgroups of patients with severe sepsis.重组人活化蛋白C在严重脓毒症患者重要临床亚组中的应用。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):12-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00002.
5
Drotrecogin alfa: a second look. More clinical trials in severe sepsis: mostly negative results.活化蛋白C:再审视。更多针对严重脓毒症的临床试验:大多为阴性结果。
Prescrire Int. 2007 Feb;16(87):7-9.
6
The clinical evaluation committee in a large multicenter phase 3 trial of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis (PROWESS): role, methodology, and results.在一项针对严重脓毒症患者的重组人活化蛋白C(drotrecogin alfa)大型多中心3期试验(PROWESS)中临床评估委员会:作用、方法及结果
Crit Care Med. 2003 Sep;31(9):2291-301. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000085089.88077.AF.
7
International integrated database for the evaluation of severe sepsis and drotrecogin alfa (activated) therapy: analysis of efficacy and safety data in a large surgical cohort.用于评估严重脓毒症和活化蛋白C治疗的国际综合数据库:大型外科队列中的疗效和安全性数据分析
Surgery. 2006 Nov;140(5):726-39. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.009.
8
Benefit-risk assessment of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of sepsis.重组人活化蛋白C治疗脓毒症的效益-风险评估
Drug Saf. 2007;30(11):995-1010. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730110-00002.
9
Readministration of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in an adult with severe sepsis.成年严重脓毒症患者中重酒石酸去氨加压素(激活型)的再给药。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Sep 15;68(18):1711-5. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110043.
10
Cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the treatment of severe sepsis.重组人活化蛋白C治疗严重脓毒症的成本效益分析
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):1-11. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of transfusion on patients with sepsis admitted in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.输血对重症监护病房脓毒症患者的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0226-5. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
2
Impact of Sepsis Classification and Multidrug-Resistance Status on Outcome Among Patients Treated With Appropriate Therapy.脓毒症分类和多重耐药状态对接受适当治疗患者预后的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1580-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001013.
3
Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction assay for pathogen detection in septic patients under routine condition: an observational study.
在常规条件下对脓毒症患者进行病原体检测的聚合酶链反应检测评估:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046003. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
4
Risk factors for aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity in surgical intensive care unit patients.外科重症监护病房患者中氨基糖苷类药物相关性肾毒性的危险因素。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2011 Jan;1(1):17-21. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.79277.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis.系统评价和荟萃分析适当经验性抗生素治疗脓毒症的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Nov;54(11):4851-63. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00627-10. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
6
Empiric combination antibiotic therapy is associated with improved outcome against sepsis due to Gram-negative bacteria: a retrospective analysis.经验性联合抗生素治疗与革兰氏阴性菌引起的脓毒症的改善结果相关:一项回顾性分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 May;54(5):1742-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01365-09. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
7
A multicenter trial to compare blood culture with polymerase chain reaction in severe human sepsis.多中心试验比较菌血症患者血液培养与聚合酶链反应。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb;36(2):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1705-z. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
8
Early drotrecogin alpha (activated) administration in severe sepsis is associated with lower mortality: a retrospective analysis of the Canadian ENHANCE cohort.严重脓毒症患者早期应用活化蛋白C与较低死亡率相关:加拿大ENHANCE队列的回顾性分析
Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R78. doi: 10.1186/cc7893. Epub 2009 May 20.
9
Bench-to-bedside review: antimicrobial utilization strategies aimed at preventing the emergence of bacterial resistance in the intensive care unit.从实验台到病床的综述:旨在预防重症监护病房细菌耐药性产生的抗菌药物使用策略
Crit Care. 2005 Oct 5;9(5):459-64. doi: 10.1186/cc3757. Epub 2005 Jun 27.