Deptartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Jena University Hospital, Germany.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e46003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046003. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
Treatment of septic shock relies on appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Current culture based methods deliver final results after days, which may delay potentially lifesaving adjustments in antimicrobial therapy. This study was undertaken to compare PCR with blood culture results under routine conditions regarding 1. impact on antimicrobial therapy, and 2. time to result, in patients with presumed sepsis.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This was an observational study in a 50 beds ICU of a university hospital. In 245 patients with suspected sepsis, 311 concomitant blood cultures and blood for multiplex PCR (VYOO(®)) were obtained. 45 of 311 blood cultures (14.5%) and 94 of 311 PCRs (30.1%) were positive. However, blood culture or microbiological sampling from the presumed site of infection rarely confirmed PCR results and vice versa. Median time to positivity and interquartile range were 24.2 (18.0, 27.5) hours for the PCR and 68 (52.2, 88.5) hours for BC (p<0.01). PCR median time to result was dependent on technician availability (53.5 hours on Saturdays, 7.2 hours under optimal logistic conditions). PCR results showed good correlation with procalcitonin (p<0.001). In 34% of patients with positive PCRs antimicrobial therapy was considered inadequate according to assessment of clinical arbitrators including 5 patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), 3 cases with multiresistant staphylococci, and 4 patients with fungi.
The results of this observational study support the hypothesis that PCR results are available faster, are more frequently positive, and may result in earlier adjustment of antimicrobial therapy. However, shorter time to result can only be fully exploited when the laboratory is adequately staffed for a 24 hour/7 day service, or when point of care/automated assay systems become available.
脓毒性休克的治疗依赖于适当的抗菌治疗。目前基于培养的方法需要数天才能得出最终结果,这可能会延迟对抗菌治疗进行潜在的救命调整。本研究旨在比较聚合酶链反应(PCR)与常规条件下血培养结果,1. 对抗菌治疗的影响,2. 结果出现的时间,在疑似脓毒症患者中。
方法/主要发现:这是一家大学医院 50 张病床 ICU 的观察性研究。在 245 例疑似脓毒症患者中,共采集了 311 份血培养和血样进行多重 PCR(VYOO(®))。311 份血培养中有 45 份(14.5%)和 311 份 PCR 中有 94 份(30.1%)为阳性。然而,从疑似感染部位采集的血培养或微生物样本很少能证实 PCR 结果,反之亦然。PCR 中位阳性时间和四分位间距为 24.2(18.0,27.5)小时,BC 为 68(52.2,88.5)小时(p<0.01)。PCR 中位结果时间取决于技术员的可用性(周六 53.5 小时,最佳物流条件下 7.2 小时)。PCR 结果与降钙素原相关性良好(p<0.001)。在 34%的 PCR 阳性患者中,根据包括 5 例万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)、3 例多药耐药葡萄球菌和 4 例真菌在内的临床仲裁者的评估,抗菌治疗被认为不足。
这项观察性研究的结果支持这样一种假设,即 PCR 结果更快得出,更频繁地呈阳性,并可能更早地调整抗菌治疗。然而,只有当实验室有足够的人力提供 24 小时/7 天服务,或者当即时护理/自动化检测系统可用时,才能充分利用较短的结果出现时间。