Suppr超能文献

八旬老人的颈动脉内膜切除术:年龄增长是否意味着“高风险”?

Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: does increased age indicate "high risk?".

作者信息

Miller M Todd, Comerota Anthony J, Tzilinis Argyrios, Daoud Yahya, Hammerling Jay

机构信息

Jobst Vascular Center, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2005 Feb;41(2):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is proven to be the most effective treatment for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of 50% or greater and asymptomatic carotid stenosis of 60% or greater. Although the prevalence of carotid artery disease increases with age, most prospective and randomized trials have excluded patients older than 80 years, implying that they are either at higher procedural risk or have decreased life expectancy. Since advanced age (>/=80 years) has been viewed as a "high-risk" indicator for CEA, age >/=80 years has been used as an indication for alternative treatment. The study was conducted to determine if age >/=80 years is related to increased morbidity, mortality, and length of stay in patients undergoing CEA.

METHODS

In the 12-year period from 1993 to 2004, 2217 CEAs were performed in 1961 patients. Three hundred sixty procedures were performed in 334 patients >/=80 years. Demographics, presentation, risk factors, operative outcome, and survival were analyzed. Contemporary literature was reviewed and the results summarized.

RESULTS

In patients aged >/=80 years, compared with their younger cohort, there was no difference in stroke (1.1% vs 0.8%, P = .333) but there was a higher operative mortality (1.9% vs 0.8%, P = .053). The combined stroke/death rate was higher in octogenarians (3.1% vs 1.5%, P = .041). This difference was due to the greater stroke/death rate in symptomatic octogenarians vs asymptomatic octogenarians (6.0% vs 0.9%, P = .007). The average postoperative length of stay was 3.2 +/- 4.8 days for octogenarians compared with 2.4 +/- 3.5 days for their younger counterparts ( P < .001). Thirty-seven percent of the octogenarians were discharged on the first postoperative day vs 51% ( P < .001), whereas 13% remained hospitalized beyond 5 days vs 8% ( P = .003). Although Kaplan-Meier survival curves show a higher mortality in octogenarians, survival after CEA approaches that of the overall population. A summary of the contemporary literature of CEA in 2204 patients >/=80 shows an operative stroke rate of 2.23% and death rate of 1.28%, with a combined stroke/death rate of 3.51%.

CONCLUSION

CEA is a safe and effective procedure in the octogenarian. The combined stroke/death rate is increased in patients aged >/=80, indicating increased risk, predominantly in symptomatic patients. Although CEA risk in octogenarians is higher compared with a younger cohort, outcomes remain within acceptable national guidelines and within outcome measures known to confer benefit compared with best medical care. Therefore, the term "high risk" should not be arbitrarily applied to patients reaching the 80-year threshold. This is confirmed by the contemporary literature.

摘要

目的

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)已被证明是治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄达50%及以上以及无症状性颈动脉狭窄达60%及以上的最有效方法。虽然颈动脉疾病的患病率随年龄增长而增加,但大多数前瞻性随机试验都将80岁以上的患者排除在外,这意味着他们要么手术风险更高,要么预期寿命较短。由于高龄(≥80岁)一直被视为CEA的“高风险”指标,≥80岁已被用作选择替代治疗的指征。本研究旨在确定≥80岁是否与接受CEA治疗的患者发病率、死亡率及住院时间增加有关。

方法

在1993年至2004年的12年期间,对1961例患者实施了2217例CEA手术。对334例≥80岁的患者实施了360例手术。分析了人口统计学资料、临床表现、危险因素、手术结果及生存率。查阅了当代文献并总结了结果。

结果

在≥80岁的患者中,与较年轻的患者群体相比,卒中发生率无差异(1.1%对0.8%,P = 0.333),但手术死亡率较高(1.9%对0.8%,P = 0.053)。80岁及以上老人的卒中/死亡率合并率更高(3.1%对1.5%,P = 0.041)。这种差异是由于有症状的80岁及以上老人与无症状的80岁及以上老人相比,卒中/死亡率更高(6.0%对0.9%,P = 0.007)。80岁及以上老人术后平均住院时间为3.2±4.8天,而较年轻患者为2.4±3.5天(P < 0.001)。37%的80岁及以上老人在术后第一天出院,而较年轻患者为51%(P < 0.001),13%的80岁及以上老人住院超过5天,而较年轻患者为8%(P = 0.003)。虽然Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示80岁及以上老人的死亡率较高,但CEA术后的生存率接近总体人群。对2204例≥80岁患者的CEA当代文献综述显示,手术卒中发生率为2.23%,死亡率为1.28%,卒中/死亡率合并率为3.51%。

结论

CEA对80岁及以上老人是一种安全有效的手术。≥80岁患者的卒中/死亡率合并率增加,表明风险增加,主要是有症状的患者。虽然80岁及以上老人的CEA风险比年轻患者群体高,但结果仍在可接受的国家指南范围内,且与最佳药物治疗相比,在已知能带来益处的结果指标范围内。因此,“高风险”一词不应随意用于达到80岁门槛的患者。当代文献证实了这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验