• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在常规实践中,接受颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状或有症状狭窄的患者,住院期间发生中风或死亡的风险与年龄有关,而与性别无关:对2009年至2014年德国全国法定质量保证数据库的二次数据分析

Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Is Associated With Age But Not Sex in Patients Treated With Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Stenosis in Routine Practice: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German Statutory Quality Assurance Database From 2009 to 2014.

作者信息

Schmid Sofie, Tsantilas Pavlos, Knappich Christoph, Kallmayer Michael, König Thomas, Breitkreuz Thorben, Zimmermann Alexander, Kuehnl Andreas, Eckstein Hans-Henning

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich, Germany.

AQUA-Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 13;6(3):e004764. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004764.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.116.004764
PMID:28288976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5524011/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guideline recommendations on carotid endarterectomy are based predominantly on randomized, controlled trials, in which women or elderly patients are often under-represented. This study analyzed the association of age and sex with the risk of in-hospital stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy under routine conditions in Germany.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Secondary data analysis using the Statutory German Quality Assurance Database on all carotid endarterectomy procedures (n=142 074) performed between 2009 and 2014. Primary outcome was any stroke or death until discharge; secondary outcomes were any in-hospital stroke (alone), and death (alone). Descriptive statistics and multilevel multivariable regression analyses were applied. Patients were predominately male (68%), with mean age 71 years. Carotid stenosis was symptomatic in 40%. Primary outcome occurred in 1.8% of women and 1.9% of men. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that more-advanced age was associated with a higher primary outcome rate (relative risk [RR] per 10-year increase: 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.24). Risk of death (alone) was associated with age (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.54-1.84). Age was associated with the risk of stroke (alone; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.11). Sex was not associated with primary outcome rate (1.01; 95% CI, 0.93-1.10), nor did it significantly modify the age effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that increasing age, but not sex, is associated with a higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death following carotid endarterectomy under everyday conditions in Germany. Whereas the risk of death (alone) is significantly associated with age, the association between age and the risk of stroke (alone) can be considered of minor importance.

摘要

背景

关于颈动脉内膜切除术的指南建议主要基于随机对照试验,而在这些试验中,女性或老年患者的代表性往往不足。本研究分析了在德国常规条件下,年龄和性别与颈动脉内膜切除术后住院期间发生中风或死亡风险之间的关联。

方法与结果

利用德国法定质量保证数据库对2009年至2014年间进行的所有颈动脉内膜切除术(n = 142074例)进行二次数据分析。主要结局是出院前发生的任何中风或死亡;次要结局是任何住院期间单独发生的中风以及单独发生的死亡。采用描述性统计和多水平多变量回归分析。患者以男性为主(68%),平均年龄71岁。40%的患者有症状性颈动脉狭窄。主要结局在1.8%的女性和1.9%的男性中发生。多变量回归分析显示,年龄越大,主要结局发生率越高(每增加10岁的相对风险[RR]:1.19;95%CI,1.14 - 1.24)。单独死亡风险与年龄相关(RR,1.68;95%CI,1.54 - 1.84)。年龄与单独中风风险相关(RR,1.05;95%CI,1.00 - 1.11)。性别与主要结局发生率无关(1.01;95%CI,0.93 - 1.10),也未显著改变年龄效应。

结论

本研究表明,在德国日常条件下,颈动脉内膜切除术后住院期间发生中风或死亡的风险增加与年龄有关,而非性别有关。单独死亡风险与年龄显著相关,而年龄与单独中风风险之间的关联可认为不太重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/e578addbc2a4/JAH3-6-e004764-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/bbbe05b9f591/JAH3-6-e004764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/8ebe6c1a4016/JAH3-6-e004764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/1940e0bbcd91/JAH3-6-e004764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/e578addbc2a4/JAH3-6-e004764-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/bbbe05b9f591/JAH3-6-e004764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/8ebe6c1a4016/JAH3-6-e004764-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/1940e0bbcd91/JAH3-6-e004764-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76d8/5524011/e578addbc2a4/JAH3-6-e004764-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Is Associated With Age But Not Sex in Patients Treated With Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic or Symptomatic Stenosis in Routine Practice: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German Statutory Quality Assurance Database From 2009 to 2014.在常规实践中,接受颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状或有症状狭窄的患者,住院期间发生中风或死亡的风险与年龄有关,而与性别无关:对2009年至2014年德国全国法定质量保证数据库的二次数据分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 13;6(3):e004764. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004764.
2
Patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of emergency carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting after stroke in evolution.进展性卒中后行急诊颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术患者的特征和院内结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;68(2):436-444.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.085. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Age but not sex is associated with higher risk of in-hospital stroke or death after carotid artery stenting in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.年龄而非性别与症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术后住院期间卒中或死亡风险增加相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Apr;69(4):1090-1101.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.439.
4
Different perioperative antiplatelet therapies for patients treated with carotid endarterectomy in routine practice.常规实践中接受颈动脉内膜切除术患者的不同围手术期抗血小板治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1753-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
5
Last neurologic event is associated with risk of in-hospital stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: Secondary data analysis of the German statutory quality assurance database.末次神经系统事件与颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术后住院期间卒中或死亡风险相关:德国法定质量保证数据库的二次数据分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;70(5):1488-1498. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.038. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
6
Intraoperative Completion Studies, Local Anesthesia, and Antiplatelet Medication Are Associated With Lower Risk in Carotid Endarterectomy.术中完成研究、局部麻醉和抗血小板药物与颈动脉内膜切除术风险较低相关。
Stroke. 2017 Apr;48(4):955-962. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014869. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
7
Significant Association of Annual Hospital Volume With the Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy but Likely Not After Carotid Stenting: Secondary Data Analysis of the Statutory German Carotid Quality Assurance Database.年度医院手术量与颈动脉内膜切除术后住院期间发生卒中或死亡风险之间存在显著关联,但颈动脉支架置入术后可能不存在这种关联:对德国法定颈动脉质量保证数据库的二次数据分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004171.
8
The Use of Embolic Protection Devices Is Associated With a Lower Stroke and Death Rate After Carotid Stenting.使用栓塞保护装置与颈动脉支架置入术后较低的卒中和死亡率相关。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 26;10(12):1257-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.032.
9
Treatment of significant carotid artery stenosis in 1824 patients.1824例严重颈动脉狭窄的治疗
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Feb;56(1):107-18. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
10
Patient characteristics and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: analysis of the German mandatory national quality assurance registry - 2003 to 2014.颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的患者特征及结局:对2003年至2014年德国强制性国家质量保证登记处的分析
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Dec;56(6):827-36. Epub 2015 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of patient characteristics that may improve procedure selection for the treatment of carotid stenosis.识别可能改善颈动脉狭窄治疗方案选择的患者特征。
Br J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;111(10). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae227.
2
Impact of the type of anesthesia on adverse events during transcarotid artery revascularization.麻醉类型对颈动脉血运重建术期间不良事件的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1716-1726.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.091. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Association between hospital ownership and patient selection, management, and outcomes after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting : - Secondary data analysis of the Bavarian statutory quality assurance database.

本文引用的文献

1
Significant Association of Annual Hospital Volume With the Risk of Inhospital Stroke or Death Following Carotid Endarterectomy but Likely Not After Carotid Stenting: Secondary Data Analysis of the Statutory German Carotid Quality Assurance Database.年度医院手术量与颈动脉内膜切除术后住院期间发生卒中或死亡风险之间存在显著关联,但颈动脉支架置入术后可能不存在这种关联:对德国法定颈动脉质量保证数据库的二次数据分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004171.
2
Short Time Interval Between Neurologic Event and Carotid Surgery Is Not Associated With an Increased Procedural Risk.神经系统事件与颈动脉手术之间的短时间间隔与手术风险增加无关。
Stroke. 2016 Nov;47(11):2783-2790. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014058. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
3
医院所有权与颈动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术后患者选择、管理和结局的关系:-巴伐利亚法定质量保证数据库的二次数据分析。
BMC Surg. 2024 May 17;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02448-6.
4
Asymptomatic Females Are at Higher Risk for Perioperative TIA/Stroke and Males Are at Higher Risk for Long-Term Mortality after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Vascular Quality Initiative Analysis.无症状女性在颈动脉支架置入术后围手术期发生短暂性脑缺血发作/中风的风险更高,而男性在术后长期死亡风险更高:一项血管质量改进计划分析。
Int J Angiol. 2020 Sep 16;33(1):36-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712506. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Influences of age and gender on operative risks following carotid endarterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.年龄和性别对颈动脉内膜切除术术后手术风险的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 May 10;18(5):e0285540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285540. eCollection 2023.
6
Safety of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Stenosis by Age: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient Data.颈动脉内膜切除术治疗症状性狭窄的安全性与年龄的关系:荟萃分析与个体患者数据。
Stroke. 2023 Feb;54(2):457-467. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040819. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Extra-Cranial Carotid Artery Stenosis: An Objective Analysis of the Available Evidence.颅外颈动脉狭窄:现有证据的客观分析
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 21;13:739999. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.739999. eCollection 2022.
8
The Efficacy of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal System Compared to Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,使用血流逆转系统的经颈动脉血管重建术的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 19;8:695295. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695295. eCollection 2021.
9
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.无症状性颈动脉手术试验 2(ACST-2):颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的随机比较
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1065-1073. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
10
Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的管理可能需要个体化:多学科行动呼吁。
J Stroke. 2021 May;23(2):202-212. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.04273. Epub 2021 May 31.
A Consensus German Reporting Standard for Secondary Data Analyses, Version 2 (STROSA-STandardisierte BerichtsROutine für SekundärdatenAnalysen).德国二次数据分析报告标准共识,第2版(STROSA - 二次数据分析标准化报告流程)
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e145-e160. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-108647. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
4
A Retrospective 10-Year, Single-Institution Study of Carotid Endarterectomy with a Focus on Elderly Patients.一项为期10年的单机构回顾性研究:聚焦老年患者的颈动脉内膜切除术
J Clin Neurol. 2016 Jan;12(1):49-56. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2016.12.1.49.
5
Carotid Plaque Morphology Is Significantly Associated With Sex, Age, and History of Neurological Symptoms.颈动脉斑块形态与性别、年龄及神经症状史显著相关。
Stroke. 2015 Nov;46(11):3213-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010558. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
6
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.使用常规收集的健康数据进行研究的报告(RECORD)声明
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.
7
Meta- analysis and meta-regression analysis of the associations between sex and the operative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy.性别与颈动脉内膜切除术手术结果之间关联的Meta分析和Meta回归分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 May 9;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0029-x.
8
Sex differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention.心血管危险因素与疾病预防中的性别差异。
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jul;241(1):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.01.027. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
9
[Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations].[二次数据分析的良好实践(GPS):指南与建议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Feb;77(2):120-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396815. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
Comparison of robustness to outliers between robust poisson models and log-binomial models when estimating relative risks for common binary outcomes: a simulation study.在估计常见二元结局的相对风险时,稳健泊松模型与对数二项模型对异常值的稳健性比较:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 26;14:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-82.