• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing positive and negative changes in the aftermath of adversity: psychometric evaluation of the changes in outlook questionnaire.

作者信息

Joseph Stephen, Linley P Alex, Andrews Leanne, Harris George, Howle Barry, Woodward Clare, Shevlin Mark

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):70-80. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.70.

DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.70
PMID:15769229
Abstract

The Changes in Outlook Questionnaire (CiOQ; S. Joseph, R. Williams, & W. Yule, 1993) is a 26-item self-report measure that was designed to assess positive and negative changes in the aftermath of adversity. This article had 3 aims: 1st, to investigate the factor structure of the CiOQ; 2nd, to test for internal consistency reliability and convergent and discriminant validity; and, 3rd, to investigate the association between positive and negative changes in outlook, posttraumatic stress, and psychological distress. Three studies are reported. Study 1 provides evidence that positive and negative changes are statistically separable and that the 2-factor model is a better fit than the 1-factor model. Studies 2 and 3 provide evidence for internal consistency reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of the CiOQ, and its associations with posttraumatic stress and psychological distress. In conclusion, the CiOQ has much promise for research on responses to stressful and traumatic events.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing positive and negative changes in the aftermath of adversity: psychometric evaluation of the changes in outlook questionnaire.
Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):70-80. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.70.
2
Short form of the Changes in Outlook Questionnaire: translation and validation of the Chinese version.简明展望变化问卷的缩写本:中文版的翻译与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Apr 24;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-41.
3
Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.社交焦虑与对负面评价的恐惧:BFNE-II的结构效度
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 3.
4
Negative problem orientation (Part I): psychometric properties of a new measure.消极问题取向(第一部分):一种新测量方法的心理测量特性
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Mar;43(3):391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.007.
5
The Injury Distress Index: development and validation.损伤困扰指数:编制与验证
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Oct;89(10):1893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.032.
6
The development and psychometric evaluation of the emotional reactivity and numbing scale.情绪反应与麻木量表的编制及心理测量学评估
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007 Oct;195(10):830-6. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318156816f.
7
Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ Vaginal Symptoms Questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS.ICIQ阴道症状问卷(ICIQ-VS)的编制与心理测量学评估
BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):700-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00938.x.
8
Assessing health-related quality of life in NeuroAIDS: some psychometric properties of the Neurological Quality of Life Questionnaire (NeuroQOL).评估神经艾滋病患者与健康相关的生活质量:神经生活质量问卷(NeuroQOL)的一些心理测量学特性。
J Clin Neurosci. 2007 May;14(5):416-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.03.004. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
9
Validation of a patient-administered questionnaire to measure the severity and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI): the UTI Symptom Assessment questionnaire.一份由患者自行填写的问卷用于评估单纯性尿路感染(UTI)时下尿路症状的严重程度及困扰程度的有效性:尿路感染症状评估问卷
BJU Int. 2005 Aug;96(3):350-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05630.x.
10
Further development of the Norbeck Social Support Questionnaire: normative data and validity testing.诺贝克社会支持问卷的进一步发展:常模数据与效度检验。
Nurs Res. 1983 Jan-Feb;32(1):4-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The posttraumatic cognitive appraisal inventory (PTCAI): development and validation.创伤后认知评估量表(PTCAI):编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 22;14:1224984. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1224984. eCollection 2023.
2
Effects of Post Traumatic Growth on Successful Aging in Breast Cancer Survivors in South Korea: The Mediating Effect of Resilience and Intolerance of Uncertainty.创伤后成长对韩国乳腺癌幸存者成功老龄化的影响:心理韧性和对不确定性的不耐受的中介作用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 28;11(21):2843. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212843.
3
Hope, optimism, and pessimism as predictors of positive and negative psychological changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovak adults.
希望、乐观主义和悲观主义作为斯洛伐克成年人中与新冠疫情相关的积极和消极心理变化的预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1151027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1151027. eCollection 2023.
4
Hope and post-stress growth during COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of perceived stress and the moderating role of empathy.新冠疫情期间的希望与应激后成长:感知应激的中介作用与共情的调节作用
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Aug;178:110831. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110831. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
5
A Systematic Review of Benefit-Finding and Growth in Pediatric Medical Populations.儿科医疗人群中受益发现和成长的系统评价。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Sep 27;46(9):1076-1090. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab041.
6
Post-traumatic stress symptoms in hemodialysis patients with MERS-CoV exposure.接触中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)的血液透析患者的创伤后应激症状
Biopsychosoc Med. 2020 Apr 15;14:9. doi: 10.1186/s13030-020-00181-z. eCollection 2020.
7
Resilience in Cancer Patients.癌症患者的复原力
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 5;10:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208. eCollection 2019.
8
Assessing Stigma, Disclosure Regret and Posttraumatic Growth in People Living with HIV.评估 HIV 感染者的污名、披露后悔和创伤后成长。
AIDS Behav. 2018 Dec;22(12):3916-3923. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2230-2.
9
Psychological morbidity and return to work after injury: multicentre cohort study.心理疾病与受伤后重返工作岗位:多中心队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Aug;67(661):e555-e564. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691673. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
The impact of psychological factors on recovery from injury: a multicentre cohort study.心理因素对损伤恢复的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;52(7):855-866. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1299-z. Epub 2016 Nov 1.