Sturman Michael C, Cheramie Robin A, Cashen Luke H
School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):269-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.269.
Although research has shown that individual job performance changes over time, the extent of such changes is unknown. In this article, the authors define and distinguish between the concepts of temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability when considering individual job performance ratings over time. Furthermore, the authors examine measurement type (i.e., subjective and objective measures) and job complexity in relation to temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability. On the basis of meta-analytic results, the authors found that the test-retest reliability of these ratings ranged from .83 for subjective measures in low-complexity jobs to .50 for objective measures in high-complexity jobs. The stability of these ratings over a 1-year time lag ranged from .85 to .67. The analyses also reveal that correlations between performance measures decreased as the time interval between performance measurements increased, but the estimates approached values greater than zero.
尽管研究表明个体工作绩效会随时间变化,但这种变化的程度尚不清楚。在本文中,作者在考虑个体工作绩效评级随时间的变化时,对时间一致性、稳定性和重测信度的概念进行了定义和区分。此外,作者还研究了测量类型(即主观和客观测量)以及与时间一致性、稳定性和重测信度相关的工作复杂性。基于元分析结果,作者发现这些评级的重测信度范围从低复杂性工作中主观测量的0.83到高复杂性工作中客观测量的0.50。这些评级在1年时间间隔内的稳定性范围从0.85到0.67。分析还表明,绩效测量之间的相关性随着绩效测量之间时间间隔的增加而降低,但估计值接近大于零的值。