Fuzun M
Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Inciralty, Izmir, Turkey.
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2004;51(2):69-71. doi: 10.2298/aci0402069f.
Thirty percent of deaths are related to locoreional recurrence. All patients with nonhepatic abdominal recurrence (NHAR) were considered as having locoregional failure. The aims of this study are firstly to retrospectively evaluate the results of potentially curative resection and palliative treatment modalities for a group of 25 patients with NHAR from rectal cancer. The second aim is to determine the effectiveness of R1 resection in these patients in terms of survival. In this study we have followed 25 patients with NHAR of which 10 were able to undergo potentially curative salvage resection, whilst the remaining 15 had either a palliative (R2) or no resection. The goals of treatment for recurrent rectal cancer are palliation of symptoms, a good quality of life, and if possible, cure with a low rate of treatment--related complications. Indications for salvage surgery depend on several factors including the extent of disease, the presence of concomitant illness and the surgeons experience. Systemic disease, systemic disease with peritoneal implants, multiple hepatic metastases, or extensive pelvic involvement preclude surgical treatment for cure. Curative and noncurative surgical procedures were performed width acceptable complications in the series presented hereThe mean survival for the group undergoing R0 resection was 50 months versus 55 months for the group undergoing R1 resection (not significant). Mean survival were 7,3 and 6 months in the groups undergoing R2, NR and NS respectively. The 5-year survival for the 10 patients who had potentially curative resection was 30 per cent versus 0 per cent for 15 patients who had non-curative procedures (p = 0.001). There was 1 post-operative 30 day mortality in the series of 19 patients who underwent surgery. Five patients (6 per cent) developed one or more post-operative complications. Two of them required reoperation.
30%的死亡与局部复发相关。所有非肝性腹部复发(NHAR)的患者均被视为存在局部区域失败。本研究的目的首先是回顾性评估一组25例直肠癌非肝性腹部复发患者的潜在根治性切除和姑息性治疗方式的结果。第二个目的是确定R1切除在这些患者生存方面的有效性。在本研究中,我们随访了25例非肝性腹部复发患者,其中10例能够接受潜在根治性挽救性切除,而其余15例接受了姑息性(R2)切除或未切除。复发性直肠癌的治疗目标是缓解症状、提高生活质量,如有可能,以低治疗相关并发症发生率实现治愈。挽救性手术的指征取决于几个因素,包括疾病范围、合并症情况和外科医生的经验。全身性疾病、伴有腹膜种植的全身性疾病、多发肝转移或广泛盆腔受累排除了治愈性手术治疗。在本系列中,根治性和非根治性手术均在可接受的并发症范围内进行。接受R0切除组的平均生存期为50个月,接受R1切除组为55个月(无显著差异)。接受R2、NR和NS治疗组的平均生存期分别为7、3和6个月。10例接受潜在根治性切除患者的5年生存率为30%,而15例接受非根治性手术患者的5年生存率为0%(p = 0.001)。在接受手术的19例患者系列中有1例术后30天死亡。5例患者(6%)出现一种或多种术后并发症。其中2例需要再次手术。