Arnedt J Todd, Geddes M Ainsley C, MacLean Alistair W
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
J Psychosom Res. 2005 Jan;58(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.05.002.
The objectives of this study were to compare (1) the sensitivity of simulated driving to self-report measures, nocturnal sleep latency tests (SLTs), and an auditory vigilance task and (2) urban and motorway driving.
Healthy males 18 to 35 years maintained wakefulness for one night and were tested at 2400, 0230, 0500 and 0730 h. In Study 1 (n=11), the SLTs were followed by auditory vigilance and simulated driving tasks; in Study 2 (n=18), the SLTs were preceded and followed by simulated driving on motorway and urban routes.
In Study 1, speed variability, tracking variability, and driving off the road on the driving simulator had comparable sensitivity to d' on the auditory vigilance task. In Study 2, driving performance was consistently worse on the motorway route.
The driving simulator was equally sensitive to another performance measure during prolonged wakefulness and impairments were greater with motorway driving.
本研究的目的是比较:(1)模拟驾驶与自我报告测量、夜间睡眠潜伏期测试(SLT)以及听觉警觉任务的敏感性;(2)城市道路驾驶和高速公路驾驶。
18至35岁的健康男性保持一晚清醒,并于24:00、02:30、05:00和07:30进行测试。在研究1(n = 11)中,先进行SLT,随后是听觉警觉和模拟驾驶任务;在研究2(n = 18)中,在高速公路和城市道路上进行模拟驾驶之前和之后都进行了SLT。
在研究1中,驾驶模拟器上的速度变异性、跟踪变异性以及驶离道路情况与听觉警觉任务中的d'具有相当的敏感性。在研究2中,高速公路路段的驾驶表现始终较差。
在长时间清醒期间,驾驶模拟器对另一项性能测量同样敏感,并且高速公路驾驶时的损伤更大。