Suppr超能文献

两种相衬技术的定量比较:衍射增强成像与相位传播成像。

Quantitative comparison between two phase contrast techniques: diffraction enhanced imaging and phase propagation imaging.

作者信息

Pagot Elodie, Fiedler Stefan, Cloetens Peter, Bravin Alberto, Coan Paola, Fezzaa Kamel, Baruchel José, Härtwig Jürgen, von Smitten Karl, Leidenius Marjut, Karjalainen-Lindsberg Marja-Liisa, Keyriläinen Jani

机构信息

European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, 6 rue Horowitz, BP220, F-38043 Grenoble, France.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2005 Feb 21;50(4):709-24. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/010.

Abstract

Two x-ray phase contrast imaging techniques are compared in a quantitative way for future mammographic applications: diffraction enhanced imaging (DEI) and phase propagation imaging (PPI). DEI involves, downstream of the sample, an analyser crystal acting as an angular filter for x-rays refracted by the sample. PPI simply uses the propagation (Fresnel diffraction) of the monochromatic and partially coherent x-ray beam over large distances. The information given by the two techniques is assessed by theoretical simulations and compared at the level of the experimental results for different kinds of samples (phantoms and real tissues). The imaging parameters such as the energy, the angular position of the analyser crystal in the DEI case or the sample to detector distance in the PPI case were varied in order to optimize the image quality in terms of contrast, visibility and figure of merit.

摘要

为了未来在乳腺X线摄影中的应用,对两种X射线相衬成像技术进行了定量比较:衍射增强成像(DEI)和相位传播成像(PPI)。DEI在样品下游涉及一个分析晶体,它作为由样品折射的X射线的角度滤波器。PPI则简单地利用单色且部分相干的X射线束在大距离上的传播(菲涅耳衍射)。通过理论模拟评估这两种技术给出的信息,并在不同类型样品(模型和真实组织)的实验结果层面进行比较。为了在对比度、可见性和品质因数方面优化图像质量,对成像参数进行了变化,如能量、DEI情况下分析晶体的角位置或PPI情况下样品到探测器的距离。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验