Mosimann Urs P, Müri René M, Burn David J, Felblinger Jacques, O'Brien John T, McKeith Ian G
Institute for Ageing and Health, Wolfson Research Centre, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Brain. 2005 Jun;128(Pt 6):1267-76. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh484. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
Neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) affect cortical and subcortical networks involved in saccade generation. We therefore expected impairments in saccade performance in both disorders. In order to improve the pathophysiological understanding and to investigate the usefulness of saccades for differential diagnosis, saccades were tested in age- and education-matched patients with PDD (n = 20) and DLB (n = 20), Alzheimer's disease (n = 22) and Parkinson's disease (n = 24), and controls (n = 24). Reflexive (gap, overlap) and complex saccades (prediction, decision and antisaccade) were tested with electro-oculography. PDD and DLB patients had similar impairment in all tasks (P > 0.05, not significant). Compared with controls, they were impaired in both reflexive saccade execution (gap and overlap latencies, P < 0.0001; gains, P < 0.004) and complex saccade performance (target prediction, P < 0.0001; error decisions, P < 0.003; error antisaccades: P < 0.0001). Patients with Alzheimer's disease were only impaired in complex saccade performance (Alzheimer's disease versus controls, target prediction P < 0.001, error decisions P < 0.0001, error antisaccades P < 0.0001), but not reflexive saccade execution (for all, P > 0.05). Patients with Parkinson's disease had, compared with controls, similar complex saccade performance (for all, P > 0.05) and only minimal impairment in reflexive tasks, i.e. hypometric gain in the gap task (P = 0.04). Impaired saccade execution in reflexive tasks allowed discrimination between DLB versus Alzheimer's disease (sensitivity > or =60%, specificity > or =77%) and between PDD versus Parkinson's disease (sensitivity > or =60%, specificity > or =88%) when +/-1.5 standard deviations was used for group discrimination. We conclude that impairments in reflexive saccades may be helpful for differential diagnosis and are minimal when either cortical (Alzheimer's disease) or nigrostriatal neurodegeneration (Parkinson's disease) exists solely; however, they become prominent with combined cortical and subcortical neurodegeneration in PDD and DLB. The similarities in saccade performance in PDD and DLB underline the overlap between these conditions and underscore differences from Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.
帕金森病痴呆(PDD)和路易体痴呆(DLB)中的神经退行性变会影响参与扫视生成的皮质和皮质下网络。因此,我们预计这两种疾病的扫视功能都会受损。为了增进对病理生理学的理解,并研究扫视功能在鉴别诊断中的作用,我们对年龄和教育程度匹配的PDD患者(n = 20)、DLB患者(n = 20)、阿尔茨海默病患者(n = 22)、帕金森病患者(n = 24)以及对照组(n = 24)进行了扫视功能测试。通过眼电图对反射性(间隙、重叠)和复杂扫视(预测、决策和反扫视)进行了测试。PDD和DLB患者在所有任务中的损伤相似(P > 0.05,无显著差异)。与对照组相比,他们在反射性扫视执行(间隙和重叠潜伏期,P < 0.0001;增益,P < 0.004)和复杂扫视功能(目标预测,P < 0.0001;错误决策,P < 0.003;错误反扫视:P < 0.0001)方面均受损。阿尔茨海默病患者仅在复杂扫视功能方面受损(阿尔茨海默病与对照组相比,目标预测P < 0.001,错误决策P < 0.0001,错误反扫视P < 0.0001),但在反射性扫视执行方面未受损(所有情况,P > 0.05)。与对照组相比,帕金森病患者的复杂扫视功能相似(所有情况,P > 0.05)且仅在反射性任务中有轻微损伤,即间隙任务中的低幅增益(P = 0.04)。当使用±1.5个标准差进行组间区分时,反射性任务中扫视执行受损可用于区分DLB与阿尔茨海默病(敏感性≥60%,特异性≥77%)以及PDD与帕金森病(敏感性≥60%,特异性≥88%)。我们得出结论,反射性扫视受损可能有助于鉴别诊断,并且当仅存在皮质(阿尔茨海默病)或黑质纹状体神经退行性变(帕金森病)时损伤最小;然而,在PDD和DLB中,当皮质和皮质下神经退行性变同时存在时,损伤会变得明显。PDD和DLB扫视功能的相似性突显了这些疾病之间的重叠,并强调了它们与阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病的差异。