Suppr超能文献

阿替普酶与缺血性中风:对旧数据的新综述有帮助吗?

Alteplase and ischaemic stroke: have new reviews of old data helped?

作者信息

Lindley Richard I, Wardlaw Joanna M, Sandercock Peter A G

机构信息

Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Neurol. 2005 Apr;4(4):249-53. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70044-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thrombolysis for stroke is still not widely used as current recommendations restrict treatment to selected patients. In general, these are patients who can be assessed quickly by specialised stroke teams, have intracranial haemorrhage excluded by appropriate brain imaging, and are treated with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; rt-PA) within 3 h of symptom onset. There is, however, still much debate regarding the scope of treatment and the reorganisation of services required to support an effective service.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Two recent publications have helped clarify some issues. The first was an individual-patient data meta-analysis of the alteplase trials. These analyses suggest treatment effects beyond the usual 3 h time window, but other than time to treatment no other factors influenced the effects of treatment. The second publication was a reanalysis of the original National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) alteplase trial, done after criticism of the original study. The reanalysis confirmed that there was significant baseline imbalance of stroke severity between treatment and control groups in the NINDS trial, but established that this did not materially affect the positive results of the trial. However, the recording of blood pressure in the study was found to be inconsistent and therefore unsuitable for reanalysis. The previously published data on recommendations for blood-pressure control, arising from the NINDS trial, needs to be reconsidered in this light. Both studies included too few patients to provide reliable data on which clinical and radiological features influence the response to alteplase. WHERE NEXT?: The individual-patient data meta-analysis and reanalysis of the NINDS trial have probably exhausted the potential of previous trials to answer questions on the effects of thrombolysis. Further randomised trials comparing thrombolysis with control will be required to determine whether elderly people benefit from treatment or whether there are worthwhile benefits from alteplase beyond 3 h (and in such patients, whether advanced magnetic resonance imaging is an effective way to select those most likely to benefit). Various new approaches to reperfusion also require assessment in large-scale trials: new thrombolytic drugs, the combination of intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolytic drugs, combinations of thrombolytics with new antiplatelet agents, and augmentation of thrombolysis either with mechanical devices or with transcranial ultrasound.

摘要

背景

由于当前的推荐意见将治疗限制于特定患者,中风溶栓治疗仍未得到广泛应用。一般来说,这些患者能够由专业的中风团队迅速评估,通过适当的脑部成像排除颅内出血,并在症状发作后3小时内接受阿替普酶(重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂;rt-PA)治疗。然而,关于治疗范围以及支持有效服务所需的服务重组仍存在诸多争议。

近期进展

最近的两篇出版物有助于澄清一些问题。第一篇是对阿替普酶试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析。这些分析表明,治疗效果超出了通常的3小时时间窗,但除了治疗时间外,没有其他因素影响治疗效果。第二篇出版物是对最初的美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所(NINDS)阿替普酶试验的重新分析,该分析是在对原始研究提出批评后进行的。重新分析证实,NINDS试验中治疗组和对照组之间在中风严重程度方面存在显著的基线不平衡,但确定这并未实质性影响试验的阳性结果。然而,研究中血压的记录被发现不一致,因此不适合重新分析。鉴于此,需要重新考虑先前发表的源自NINDS试验的血压控制推荐数据。两项研究纳入的患者都太少,无法提供关于哪些临床和放射学特征会影响对阿替普酶反应的可靠数据。

下一步方向

对NINDS试验的个体患者数据荟萃分析和重新分析可能已经穷尽了先前试验回答溶栓效果问题的潜力。需要进行进一步的随机试验,比较溶栓治疗与对照,以确定老年人是否能从治疗中获益,或者阿替普酶在3小时后是否有值得的益处(以及在这类患者中,先进的磁共振成像是否是选择最可能获益者的有效方法)。各种新的再灌注方法也需要在大规模试验中进行评估:新型溶栓药物、静脉和动脉溶栓药物联合使用、溶栓药物与新型抗血小板药物联合使用,以及通过机械装置或经颅超声增强溶栓效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验