Cromwell Jerry, McCall Nancy T, Burton Joseph, Urato Carol
Research Triangle Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Med Care. 2005 Apr;43(4):330-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000156864.80880.aa.
The objective of this study was to explain race/ethnic disparities in hospitalizations, utilization of high-technology diagnostic and revascularization services, and mortality of elderly ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients.
A longitudinal Medicare claims database of all Part A hospital and Part B physician services provided elderly patients admitted for IHD in 1997 is used to construct admission, utilization, and mortality rates for whites and blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and American Indians. Z-scores are used to test differences in rates between whites and minorities at the 99% confidence level. Logistic and proportional hazard models are used to predict the likelihood of revascularization and its effects on race/ethnic survival 2 years postdischarge.
The setting of this study was an acute hospital supplemented by all ambulatory Part B outpatient providers of care.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Participants included all 700,000 age 65+ Medicare beneficiaries in fee-for-service identified with IHD as a primary diagnosis on admission in 1997.
Whites were 26% more likely to be admitted for IHD than blacks, 50% more likely than Asians, 5% more than American Indians, but 3% less likely than Hispanics. Once admitted, elderly blacks and American Indians undergo invasive diagnostic and surgical revascularization far less often than whites (P < 0.01), although blacks are equally as likely as whites to be admitted to an open heart hospital. Controlling for other factors, whites reduce their 2-year mortality by 20% by undergoing revascularization 41% of the time. Blacks gain only 11% as a result of much lower rates and gains to revascularization than whites. Asians and Hispanics were slightly more likely than whites to undergo revascularization but gain less than whites from the procedure.
Despite having similar Medicare health insurance coverage, elderly utilization and IHD mortality rates differ markedly not only between whites and minorities, but within minority groups themselves. A large, nationally representative survey of physicians and patients is needed to distinguish between systemwide "failures to refer" and patient "aversions to surgery" as explanations for lower black rates of surgical interventions.
本研究的目的是解释老年缺血性心脏病(IHD)患者在住院治疗、高科技诊断和血运重建服务利用以及死亡率方面的种族/族裔差异。
利用1997年为因IHD入院的老年患者提供的所有A部分医院服务和B部分医生服务的纵向医疗保险索赔数据库,构建白人和黑人、亚洲人、西班牙裔和美国印第安人的入院率、利用率和死亡率。Z分数用于在99%置信水平下检验白人和少数族裔之间的率差异。逻辑回归和比例风险模型用于预测血运重建的可能性及其对出院后2年种族/族裔生存的影响。
本研究的背景是一家急性医院,并由所有门诊B部分门诊护理提供者提供补充。
患者/参与者:参与者包括1997年入院时被确定为主要诊断为IHD的所有70万65岁及以上的按服务收费的医疗保险受益人。
白人因IHD入院的可能性比黑人高26%,比亚洲人高50%,比美国印第安人高5%,但比西班牙裔低3%。一旦入院,老年黑人和美国印第安人接受侵入性诊断和手术血运重建的频率远低于白人(P<0.01),尽管黑人与白人一样有可能被收治到心脏专科医院。在控制其他因素后,白人通过41%的时间进行血运重建将其2年死亡率降低了20%。由于血运重建率远低于白人且获益较少,黑人仅获益11%。亚洲人和西班牙裔比白人接受血运重建的可能性略高,但从该手术中获得的益处比白人少。
尽管享有类似的医疗保险覆盖范围,但老年人的利用率和IHD死亡率不仅在白人和少数族裔之间存在显著差异,在少数族裔群体内部也存在显著差异。需要对医生和患者进行一项大规模的、具有全国代表性的调查,以区分全系统的“转诊失败”和患者“对手术的厌恶”,作为黑人手术干预率较低的解释。