Lam R W, Buchanan A, Mador J A, Corral M R, Remick R A
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada.
J Affect Disord. 1992 Apr;24(4):237-43. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(92)90108-i.
Although light therapy is a recognized effective treatment for seasonal affective disorder (SAD), there has been little research into the critical wavelengths of light that produce the antidepressant effect. Previous studies found conflicting results for the importance of the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum in the therapeutic effect of light therapy. To assess the clinical effects of UV-A wavelengths (315-400 nm), we studied 33 depressed SAD patients diagnosed with structured interviews by DSM-IIIR criteria. Following a baseline week, patients underwent 2 weeks of 2500 lux light therapy for 2 h daily (06:00-08:00). Light therapy consisted of cool-white fluorescent light with the addition of a special UV-A fluorescent tube. Patients were randomized to wear glasses during light therapy that either blocked (UV-blocked condition) or passed (UV-A condition) wavelengths below 400 nm. Both treatments significantly reduced all depression ratings, but no differences were found between the UV-A and UV-blocked conditions. We conclude that the UV-A spectrum does not increase the antidepressant response of light therapy. Given the potential side effects of chronic UV exposure, clinical application of light therapy should use light sources that have the UV spectrum filtered.
尽管光疗法是治疗季节性情感障碍(SAD)的一种公认有效的方法,但对于产生抗抑郁效果的关键光波长的研究却很少。先前的研究对于紫外线(UV)光谱在光疗法治疗效果中的重要性得出了相互矛盾的结果。为了评估UV-A波长(315 - 400纳米)的临床效果,我们通过DSM-IIIR标准的结构化访谈研究了33名被诊断为SAD的抑郁症患者。在基线周之后,患者接受为期2周、每天2小时(06:00 - 08:00)的2500勒克斯光疗法。光疗法由冷白色荧光灯加上一根特殊的UV-A荧光灯管组成。患者在光疗期间被随机分配佩戴眼镜,眼镜要么阻挡(UV阻挡组)要么透过(UV-A组)低于400纳米的波长。两种治疗方法都显著降低了所有抑郁评分,但UV-A组和UV阻挡组之间未发现差异。我们得出结论,UV-A光谱不会增加光疗法的抗抑郁反应。鉴于长期紫外线暴露的潜在副作用,光疗法的临床应用应使用滤除了紫外线光谱的光源。