Lam R W, Buchanan A, Clark C M, Remick R A
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1991 May;52(5):213-6.
Although light therapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of seasonal affective disorder (SAD), little research has been done to determine which light wavelengths affect treatment outcome. In this triple crossover study the authors compared 1 week of light therapy in which bright (2500 lux), full-spectrum fluorescent light, with and without blockade of the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum, was used with a dim (500 lux) light control in 11 SAD patients. The dim light condition had no significant antidepressant effects as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and an atypical depressive symptom (ATYP) score. The UV-light condition significantly reduced HAM-D, BDI, and ATYP scores, whereas the UV-blocked condition significantly reduced only the ATYP score. These results suggest that the UV-spectrum in light therapy may have a differential effect on typical and atypical symptoms in SAD.
尽管光疗法已被证明对季节性情感障碍(SAD)的治疗有效,但关于确定哪些光波长会影响治疗效果的研究却很少。在这项三交叉研究中,作者比较了11名SAD患者接受1周光疗法的情况,其中使用明亮(2500勒克斯)的全光谱荧光灯,有无紫外线(UV)光谱阻断,与昏暗(500勒克斯)的光对照。根据汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和非典型抑郁症状(ATYP)评分,昏暗光条件没有显著的抗抑郁作用。紫外线光条件显著降低了HAM-D、BDI和ATYP评分,而紫外线阻断条件仅显著降低了ATYP评分。这些结果表明,光疗法中的紫外线光谱可能对SAD的典型和非典型症状有不同的影响。