Suppr超能文献

转录介导扩增法(TMA)与逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)在检测肝组织中丙型肝炎病毒RNA方面的比较

Comparison of transcription mediated amplification (TMA) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in liver tissue.

作者信息

Hofmann Wolf Peter, Dries Volker, Herrmann Eva, Gärtner Barbara, Zeuzem Stefan, Sarrazin Christoph

机构信息

Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universität des Saarlandes, 66421 Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2005 Apr;32(4):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.08.011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcription mediated amplification (TMA) is known to be one of the most sensitive detection assays for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in serum but has not yet been evaluated in liver tissue. It is unknown whether the higher sensitivity of TMA in comparison with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays is related to a higher efficiency of the extraction and/or amplification step.

OBJECTIVES

The sensitivity of a TMA-based assay (Versant HCV RNA Qualitative assay, Bayer Diagnostics) and a standard RT-PCR-based assay (Cobas Amplicor HCV 2.0, Roche Diagnostics) was compared in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded liver biopsy specimens of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

STUDY DESIGN

After deparaffinization of 7.5 microm liver sections HCV RNA was extracted by standard phenol/chloroform. HCV RNA dilution panels were transferred in parallel to cDNA synthesis and amplification steps of PCR and TMA. Furthermore, TMA amplification from stepwise diluted HCV sera was performed following RNA extraction by either microcentrifuge colums (QIAmp Viral RNA spin Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or magnetic microparticles (VERSANT HCV RNA Qualitative assay).

RESULTS

The total number of HCV RNA positive liver specimens detected by TMA was higher compared with those detected by RT-PCR (P=0.032). The total number of TMA positive serum samples was higher when HCV RNA was extracted using magnetic microparticles in comparison with multicentrifuge column extraction (P=0.019).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that both the extraction and amplification step of the TMA-based assay contribute to the higher sensitivity compared with standard RT-PCR.

摘要

背景

转录介导扩增技术(TMA)是血清中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA最灵敏的检测方法之一,但尚未在肝组织中进行评估。与基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法相比,TMA更高的灵敏度是否与提取和/或扩增步骤的更高效率有关尚不清楚。

目的

在慢性丙型肝炎患者的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋肝活检标本中,比较基于TMA的检测方法(Versant HCV RNA定性检测,拜耳诊断公司)和基于标准逆转录PCR的检测方法(Cobas Amplicor HCV 2.0,罗氏诊断公司)的灵敏度。

研究设计

对7.5微米厚的肝切片进行脱蜡后,采用标准苯酚/氯仿法提取HCV RNA。将HCV RNA稀释板平行转移至PCR和TMA的cDNA合成及扩增步骤。此外,采用微量离心柱(QIAmp Viral RNA spin试剂盒,德国希尔德市Qiagen公司)或磁性微粒(VERSANT HCV RNA定性检测)提取RNA后,对逐步稀释的HCV血清进行TMA扩增。

结果

与RT-PCR检测到的HCV RNA阳性肝标本总数相比,TMA检测到的标本总数更高(P = 0.032)。与多聚离心柱提取相比,使用磁性微粒提取HCV RNA时,TMA阳性血清样本总数更高(P = 0.019)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与标准RT-PCR相比,基于TMA的检测方法的提取和扩增步骤均有助于提高灵敏度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验