van der Burg M E, Lammes F B, Verweij J
Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute, Daniël den Hoed Kliniek, Netherlands.
Neth J Med. 1992 Feb;40(1-2):36-51.
The serum tumour marker CA 125 is useful in the management of ovarian cancer, although it has its limitations. Approximately 85% of the ovarian cancer patients have an increased serum CA 125 at the start of treatment. There is a good correlation between the course of CA 125 and the clinical response of the tumour. Patients with an increasing CA 125 are found to have progressive disease in 97%. In these patients further examinations to document progression should be performed. A decrease in serum CA 125 corresponds in 87% of the patients with tumour regression. A normal serum CA 125, however, does not exclude tumour. More than 40% of the patients with a normal CA 125 still have microscopic or macroscopic tumour at second look surgery. On the other hand, an increased serum CA 125 corresponds in 90% of the patients with the presence of tumour or tumour progression shortly after the second look. The same holds for secondary debulking surgery. Patients with an increasing serum CA 125 before secondary debulking surgery have progressive disease at or shortly after surgery, even if an adequate tumour debulking has been performed. In these patients surgery should be omitted as long as no effective second line therapy is available. The course of serum CA 125 during the first 3 months of treatment is of prognostic value for response rate as well as time to progression and overall survival. Patients with a serum half-life of more than 20 days, or a CA 125 which is still high 3 months after the start of treatment, have a significantly lower response rate and progression-free survival. Whether it is possible to improve the prognosis of these patients by dose-intensification will have to be investigated in randomized trials. Serum CA 125 is not specific for ovarian cancer. High levels can also be found in patients with non-ovarian gynaecological and non-gynaecological tumours as well as patients with benign diseases and even in apparently healthy persons. In view of this aspecificity, serum CA 125 cannot be proposed for mass screening. For the same reason, serum CA 125 and the immunohistochemical staining with OC 125 are of limited value in the differential diagnosis between a primary ovarian tumour and metastatic disease in an ovary, as well as for differential diagnosis of pelvic tumours.
血清肿瘤标志物CA 125对卵巢癌的治疗有一定作用,不过也存在局限性。约85%的卵巢癌患者在治疗开始时血清CA 125升高。CA 125的变化过程与肿瘤的临床反应有良好的相关性。CA 125升高的患者中,97%被发现有疾病进展。对于这些患者,应进行进一步检查以证实疾病进展。87%的患者血清CA 125下降与肿瘤消退相关。然而,血清CA 125正常并不能排除肿瘤存在。CA 125正常的患者中,超过40%在二次探查手术时仍有镜下或肉眼可见的肿瘤。另一方面,二次探查后不久,90%血清CA 125升高的患者存在肿瘤或肿瘤进展。二次减瘤手术情况相同。二次减瘤手术前血清CA 125升高的患者,即使已进行了充分的肿瘤减瘤,在手术时或手术后不久仍有疾病进展。在没有有效的二线治疗方法时,这些患者应避免手术。治疗前3个月血清CA 125的变化过程对缓解率、疾病进展时间和总生存期具有预后价值。血清半衰期超过20天,或治疗开始3个月后CA 125仍很高的患者,缓解率和无进展生存期显著较低。是否可以通过强化剂量来改善这些患者的预后,还有待在随机试验中进行研究。血清CA 125并非卵巢癌所特有。非卵巢妇科和非妇科肿瘤患者、良性疾病患者甚至看似健康的人也可能出现高水平。鉴于这种非特异性,血清CA 125不能用于大规模筛查。出于同样的原因,血清CA 125和OC 125免疫组化染色在原发性卵巢肿瘤与卵巢转移性疾病的鉴别诊断以及盆腔肿瘤的鉴别诊断中价值有限。