Pearlman Robert A, Starks Helene, Cain Kevin C, Cole William G
Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle Division, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 28;165(6):667-74. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.6.667.
Advance care planning (ACP) aims to guide health care in the event of decisional incapacity. Interventions to promote ACP have had limited effectiveness. We conducted an educational and motivational intervention in Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinics to increase ACP use and proxy and health care provider understanding of patients' preferences and values.
We recruited 23 providers and up to 14 of each of their patients; the patients were randomized to the control or intervention group. Eligibility criteria included a preexisting relationship with the provider, age 55 years or older, chronic health condition(s), and no recorded advance directive. The intervention group (n = 119) received an ACP workbook, motivational counseling by social workers, and cues to providers to discuss ACP. The control group (n = 129) received an advance directive booklet.
The intervention patients reported more ACP discussions with their providers (64% vs 38%; P<.001). Living wills were filed in the medical record twice as often in the intervention group (48% vs 23%; P<.001). Provider-patient dyads in the intervention group had higher agreement scores than the control group for treatment preferences, values, and personal beliefs (58% vs 48%, 57% vs 46%, and 61% vs 47%, respectively; P<.01 for all comparisons). The agreement scores for the proxy-patient dyads did not differ between groups for treatment preferences and values, but were higher in the intervention than the control group for personal beliefs (67% vs 56%).
This intervention demonstrates mixed results and highlights the ongoing challenges of helping health care providers and potential proxy decision makers represent patient preferences and values.
预先照护计划(ACP)旨在在患者丧失决策能力时指导医疗护理。促进ACP的干预措施效果有限。我们在退伍军人事务部门诊诊所进行了一项教育和激励干预,以增加ACP的使用,并提高代理人及医疗服务提供者对患者偏好和价值观的理解。
我们招募了23名医疗服务提供者,每位提供者最多招募14名患者;患者被随机分为对照组或干预组。入选标准包括与医疗服务提供者已有医患关系、年龄55岁及以上、患有慢性健康疾病且无预先指示记录。干预组(n = 119)收到一本ACP工作手册,接受社会工作者的激励咨询,并收到提示医疗服务提供者讨论ACP的信息。对照组(n = 129)收到一本预先指示手册。
干预组患者报告与医疗服务提供者进行的ACP讨论更多(64%对38%;P <.001)。干预组在病历中存档生前遗嘱的频率是对照组的两倍(48%对23%;P <.001)。干预组的医患二元组在治疗偏好、价值观和个人信念方面的一致性得分高于对照组(分别为58%对48%、57%对46%、61%对47%;所有比较P <.01)。代理人与患者二元组在治疗偏好和价值观方面的一致性得分在两组之间没有差异,但在个人信念方面,干预组高于对照组(67%对56%)。
这项干预显示出混合结果,并突出了在帮助医疗服务提供者和潜在代理人决策者体现患者偏好和价值观方面持续存在的挑战。