Wilczynski Nancy L, Haynes R Brian
Health Information Research Unit, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5 Canada.
BMC Med. 2005 Mar 29;3:7. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-3-7.
Accurate diagnosis by clinicians is the cornerstone of decision making for recommending clinical interventions. The current best evidence from research concerning diagnostic tests changes unpredictably as science advances. Both clinicians and researchers need dependable access to published evidence concerning diagnostic accuracy. Bibliographic databases such as EMBASE provide the most widely available entrée to this literature. The objective of this study was to develop search strategies that optimize the retrieval of methodologically sound diagnostic studies from EMBASE for use by clinicians.
An analytic survey was conducted, comparing hand searches of 55 journals with retrievals from EMBASE for 4,843 candidate search terms and 6,574 combinations. All articles were rated using purpose and quality indicators, and clinically relevant diagnostic accuracy articles were categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' according to explicit criteria for scientific merit. Candidate search strategies were run in EMBASE, the retrievals being compared with the hand search data. The proposed search strategies were treated as "diagnostic tests" for sound studies and the manual review of the literature was treated as the "gold standard." The sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy of the search strategies were calculated.
Of the 433 articles about diagnostic tests, 97 (22.4%) met basic criteria for scientific merit. Combinations of search terms reached peak sensitivities of 100% with specificity at 70.4%. Compared with best single terms, best multiple terms increased sensitivity for sound studies by 8.2% (absolute increase), but decreased specificity (absolute decrease 6%) when sensitivity was maximized. When terms were combined to maximize specificity, the single term "specificity.tw." (specificity of 98.2%) outperformed combinations of terms.
Empirically derived search strategies combining indexing terms and textwords can achieve high sensitivity and specificity for retrieving sound diagnostic studies from EMBASE. These search filters will enhance the searching efforts of clinicians.
临床医生的准确诊断是推荐临床干预措施决策的基石。随着科学的进步,目前有关诊断试验的最佳研究证据变化无常。临床医生和研究人员都需要可靠地获取有关诊断准确性的已发表证据。诸如EMBASE之类的书目数据库提供了获取该文献的最广泛途径。本研究的目的是制定检索策略,以优化从EMBASE中检索出方法合理的诊断研究供临床医生使用。
进行了一项分析性调查,将对55种期刊的手工检索结果与从EMBASE中检索4843个候选检索词和6574种组合的结果进行比较。所有文章均使用目的和质量指标进行评分,并且根据明确的科学价值标准将临床相关的诊断准确性文章分类为“通过”或“未通过”。候选检索策略在EMBASE中运行,将检索结果与手工检索数据进行比较。拟议的检索策略被视为针对可靠研究的“诊断试验”,而文献的人工审查被视为“金标准”。计算检索策略的敏感性、特异性、精确性和准确性。
在433篇关于诊断试验的文章中, 97篇 (22.4%) 符合科学价值的基本标准。检索词组合的敏感性峰值达到100%,特异性为70.4%。与最佳单个检索词相比,最佳多个检索词在可靠研究中的敏感性提高了8.2%(绝对增加),但在敏感性最大化时特异性降低(绝对降低6%)。当检索词组合以最大化特异性时,单个检索词“specificity.tw.”(特异性为98.2%)的表现优于检索词组合。
结合索引词和文本词凭经验得出的检索策略,在从EMBASE中检索可靠的诊断研究时可实现高敏感性和特异性。这些检索过滤器将加强临床医生的检索工作。