Suppr超能文献

模拟心脏骤停时两种不同通气/按压比例下除颤和气管插管时间的差异。

Differences in time to defibrillation and intubation between two different ventilation/compression ratios in simulated cardiac arrest.

作者信息

Kill Clemens, Giesel Matthias, Eberhart Leopold, Geldner Götz, Wulf Hinnerk

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Philipps-University, D-35033 Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2005 Apr;65(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.010.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

During basic life support (BLS) by a two-rescuer-team early defibrillation and ALS procedures should be performed without interruptions of the BLS-ventilation/compression sequence. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of a ventilation/compression ratio of 5:50 versus 2:15 on the time intervals "Start BLS to first shock" and "Start BLS to intubation".

METHODS

Using a random cross over design 40 experienced paramedics performed a standard BLS/ALS-algorithm according to ILCOR guidelines in a manikin model with ventricular fibrillation (resusci skillreporter anne, Laerdal, Norway) performing both the 2:15 and the 5:50 ventilation/compression ratio. BLS was started with bag/valve/mask ventilation, a semi-automatic defibrillator (corpuls 08/16S) was connected with the manikin, ECG-analysis and three shocks were performed and the tracheal intubation was prepared. Ventilation/compression sequence was only interrupted during ECG-analysis and defibrillation. Expiratory volumes and number of compressions were measured. Variables were compared using paired Students t-test. In addition paramedics were interviewed about work-flow and emotional stress during the tests.

RESULTS

The time interval "Start BLS to first shock" was 78 s (2:15-group) versus 63 s (5:50-group), p<0.0001, the time interval "Start BLS to intubation" was 183 s (2:15-group) versus 150 s (5:50-group), p<0.0001, mean ventilation volumes per minute were 4490 ml (2:15-group) versus 4370 ml (5:50-group), p>0.1, mean number of compressions were 65 min-1. (2:15-group) versus 68 min-1 (5:50-group), p>0.1. The work-flow and emotional stress was appraised by the paramedics to be significantly superior in the 5:50 ratio (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The ventilation/compression ratio of 5:50 compared with 2:15 during BLS with an unsecured airway reduces the time until the first defibrillation and tracheal intubation was performed without changes in ventilation volume and compressions per minute. The Paramedics stated that the 5:50 ratio improved the work-flow and reduced the emotional stress.

摘要

目的

在由两人组成的急救小组进行基础生命支持(BLS)期间,早期除颤和高级生命支持(ALS)程序应在不中断BLS通气/按压序列的情况下进行。本研究的目的是确定通气/按压比为5:50与2:15对“开始BLS至首次除颤”和“开始BLS至插管”时间间隔的影响。

方法

采用随机交叉设计,40名经验丰富的护理人员在模拟心室颤动的人体模型(挪威Laerdal公司的复苏技能报告仪anne)上按照国际复苏联合会(ILCOR)指南执行标准的BLS/ALS算法,分别采用2:15和5:50的通气/按压比。BLS以袋/阀/面罩通气开始,将半自动除颤器(corpuls 08/16S)与人体模型连接,进行心电图分析并实施三次除颤,同时准备气管插管。通气/按压序列仅在心电图分析和除颤期间中断。测量呼气量和按压次数。使用配对学生t检验比较变量。此外,还就测试期间的工作流程和情绪压力对护理人员进行了访谈。

结果

“开始BLS至首次除颤”的时间间隔在2:15组为78秒,在5:50组为63秒,p<0.0001;“开始BLS至插管”的时间间隔在:15组为183秒,在5:50组为150秒,p<0.0001;每分钟平均通气量在2:15组为4490毫升,在5:50组为4370毫升,p>0.1;每分钟平均按压次数在2:15组为65次,在5:50组为68次,p>0.1。护理人员认为5:50的比例在工作流程和情绪压力方面明显更优(p<0.0001)。

结论

在气道未固定的BLS过程中,与2:15相比,5:50的通气/按压比可缩短首次除颤和气管插管前的时间,且每分钟通气量和按压次数无变化。护理人员表示,5:50的比例改善了工作流程并减轻了情绪压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验