• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单人施救者心肺复苏:任何人都能按照2000年指南建议操作吗?

Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations?

作者信息

Higdon Travis A, Heidenreich Joseph W, Kern Karl B, Sanders Arthur B, Berg Robert A, Hilwig Ron W, Clark Lani L, Ewy Gordon A

机构信息

University of Arizona College of Medicine, Sarver Heart Center, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2006 Oct;71(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.02.020
PMID:16942829
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care recommend that for adult cardiac arrest the single rescuer performs "two quick breaths followed by 15 chest compressions." This cycle is continued until additional help arrives. Previous studies have shown that lay persons and medical students take 16 +/- 1 and 14 +/- 1 s, respectively, to perform these "two quick breaths." The purpose of this study was to determine the time required for trained professional paramedic firefighters to deliver these two breaths and the effects that any increase in the time it takes to perform rescue breathing would have on the number of chest compressions delivered during single rescuer BLS CPR. We hypothesized that trained professional rescuers would also take substantially longer then the Guidelines recommendation for delivering the two rescue breaths before every 15 compressions during simulated single rescuer BLS CPR.

METHODS

Twenty-four paramedic firefighters currently certified to perform BLS CPR were evaluated for their ability to deliver the two recommended breaths within 4 s according to the AHA 2000 CPR Guidelines. Alternatively, a simplified technique of continuous chest compression BLS CPR (CCC) was also taught and compared with standard BLS CPR (STD). Without revealing the purpose of the study the paramedics were asked to perform single rescuer BLS CPR on a recording Resusci Anne while being videotaped.

RESULTS

The mean length of time needed to provide the "two quick breaths" during STD-CPR was 10 +/- 1 s. The mean number of chest compressions/min delivered with AHA BLS CPR was only 44 +/- 2. Continuous chest compression CPR resulted in 88 +/- 5 compressions delivered per minute (STD versus CCC; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Trained professional emergency rescue workers perform rescue breathing somewhat faster than lay rescuers or medical students, but still require two and one half times longer than recommended. The time required to perform these breaths significantly decreases the number of chest compressions delivered per minute. This may affect outcome as experimental studies have shown that more than 80 compressions delivered per minute are necessary for survival from prolonged cardiac arrest.

摘要

背景

《2000年心肺复苏与心血管急救指南》建议,对于成人心脏骤停,单人施救者应进行“两次快速呼吸,随后进行15次胸外按压”。这一循环持续进行,直到有更多救援人员赶到。此前的研究表明,普通人和医学生分别需要16±1秒和14±1秒来完成这“两次快速呼吸”。本研究的目的是确定训练有素的专业护理人员消防员进行这两次呼吸所需的时间,以及进行呼吸所需时间的任何增加对单人基础生命支持心肺复苏期间胸外按压次数的影响。我们假设,在模拟单人基础生命支持心肺复苏过程中,训练有素的专业救援人员在每15次按压前进行两次救援呼吸所需的时间也会比指南建议的时间长得多。

方法

对24名目前已获得基础生命支持心肺复苏认证的护理人员消防员进行评估,看他们是否有能力按照美国心脏协会2000年心肺复苏指南在4秒内完成两次推荐呼吸。另外,还教授了一种简化的持续胸外按压基础生命支持心肺复苏(CCC)技术,并与标准基础生命支持心肺复苏(STD)进行比较。在不透露研究目的的情况下,要求护理人员在录像时对模拟人Resusci Anne进行单人基础生命支持心肺复苏。

结果

在标准心肺复苏期间提供“两次快速呼吸”所需的平均时间为10±1秒。采用美国心脏协会基础生命支持心肺复苏时每分钟胸外按压的平均次数仅为44±2次。持续胸外按压心肺复苏每分钟可进行88±5次按压(标准心肺复苏与持续胸外按压心肺复苏比较;p<0.0001)。

结论

训练有素的专业急救人员进行呼吸的速度比普通救援人员或医学生稍快,但仍比建议时间长两倍半。进行这些呼吸所需的时间显著减少了每分钟胸外按压的次数。这可能会影响复苏结果,因为实验研究表明,要从长时间心脏骤停中存活下来,每分钟需要进行80多次按压。

相似文献

1
Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations?单人施救者心肺复苏:任何人都能按照2000年指南建议操作吗?
Resuscitation. 2006 Oct;71(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
2
Single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 'two quick breaths'--an oxymoron.单人实施心肺复苏:“两次快速呼吸”——自相矛盾的说法。
Resuscitation. 2004 Sep;62(3):283-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.05.013.
3
Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.救援者疲劳:标准胸外按压与持续胸外按压心肺复苏术对比
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;13(10):1020-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.049.
4
2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) of pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic life support.2005年美国心脏协会(AHA)关于儿科和新生儿患者心肺复苏(CPR)及紧急心血管护理(ECC)的指南:儿科基础生命支持
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e989-1004. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0219.
5
Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPR.不间断胸外按压心肺复苏术比标准心肺复苏术更容易实施和记忆。
Resuscitation. 2004 Nov;63(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.04.011.
6
Quality of chest compressions during 10min of single-rescuer basic life support with different compression: ventilation ratios in a manikin model.在人体模型中,采用不同按压与通气比率进行单人基本生命支持10分钟期间的胸外按压质量
Resuscitation. 2008 Apr;77(1):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.11.009. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
7
Over-the-head cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves efficacy in basic life support performed by professional medical personnel with a single rescuer: a simulation study.对于专业医务人员单人进行的基础生命支持,过头心肺复苏可提高其效果:一项模拟研究。
Anesth Analg. 2005 Jul;101(1):200-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154305.70984.6B.
8
Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.单人施救者按压/通气比例对婴儿、儿童和成人模拟人进行心肺复苏的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 May;6(3):293-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000161621.74554.15.
9
Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.胸壁减压不完全:急救医疗服务人员心肺复苏操作的临床评估及替代手动胸外按压-减压技术的评估
Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.007.
10
Using the 30:2 compression-ventilation ratio: five cycles is easier to follow than 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.采用 30:2 的压缩-通气比值:五次循环比 2 分钟的心肺复苏更易于实施。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2009 Dec;16(6):339-41. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32832d2b34.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of cognitive-motor multitasking demands on the quality of chest compressions in CPR-A randomized controlled trial.认知 - 运动多任务需求对心肺复苏中胸外按压质量的影响——一项随机对照试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;12:1536796. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1536796. eCollection 2025.
2
Cardiocerebral and cardiopulmonary resuscitation - 2017 update.心脑与心肺复苏——2017年更新版
Acute Med Surg. 2017 May 26;4(3):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ams2.281. eCollection 2017 Jul.
3
A comparison between over-the-head and lateral cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a single rescuer by bag-valve mask.
单人使用袋阀面罩进行头顶位与侧位心肺复苏的比较。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;8(1):30-7. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.125923.
4
First aid skill retention of first responders within the workplace.工作场所急救员的急救技能保持。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Feb 8;19:11. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-11.