• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用斯普林试验诊断软性颈椎间盘突出症的可靠性

Reliability of diagnosis of soft cervical disc prolapse using Spurling's test.

作者信息

Shah K Chhanalal, Rajshekhar V

机构信息

Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2004 Oct;18(5):480-3. doi: 10.1080/02688690400012350.

DOI:10.1080/02688690400012350
PMID:15799149
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Spurling's test in predicting the diagnosis of a soft lateral cervical disc prolapse. A prospective study was performed involving 50 patients with neck and arm pain; of these, 25 patients were managed surgically (Group 1) and the other 25 patients were managed conservatively (Group 2). A Spurling's test was performed in all patients and scored as positive or negative. In patients in Group 1, the operative findings were recorded as a soft or hard disc prolapse (osteophyte). In Group 2 patients, the MR findings were recorded as positive for a soft disc prolapse or negative (no disc prolapse or osteophyte only). The results of the Spurling's test were compared with the surgical or MR findings, which were considered as the gold standard. Spurling's test had a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 95% with positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.4% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.9% in predicting a diagnosis of a soft lateral cervical disc prolapse. The high positive predictive value of the test can be utilized to improve the yield of positive MR examinations in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定斯普林试验在预测软性外侧颈椎间盘突出症诊断方面的敏感性和特异性。进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入50例有颈部和手臂疼痛的患者;其中,25例患者接受手术治疗(第1组),另外25例患者接受保守治疗(第2组)。对所有患者进行了斯普林试验,并将结果记为阳性或阴性。在第1组患者中,手术结果记录为软性或硬性椎间盘突出(骨赘)。在第2组患者中,磁共振成像(MR)结果记录为软性椎间盘突出阳性或阴性(无椎间盘突出或仅有骨赘)。将斯普林试验的结果与被视为金标准的手术或MR结果进行比较。在预测软性外侧颈椎间盘突出症的诊断时,斯普林试验的敏感性为92%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值(PPV)为96.4%,阴性预测值(NPV)为90.9%。该试验较高的阳性预测值可用于提高神经根型颈椎病患者MR检查阳性结果的检出率。

相似文献

1
Reliability of diagnosis of soft cervical disc prolapse using Spurling's test.使用斯普林试验诊断软性颈椎间盘突出症的可靠性
Br J Neurosurg. 2004 Oct;18(5):480-3. doi: 10.1080/02688690400012350.
2
Spurling's test - inconsistencies in clinical practice.斯伯林试验-临床实践中的不一致性。
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Feb;29(1):23-32. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1762526. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
3
Reliability of cervical radiculopathy, its congruence between patient history and medical imaging evidence of disc herniation and its role in surgical decision.神经根型颈椎病的可靠性、患者病史与椎间盘突出症医学影像证据之间的一致性及其在手术决策中的作用。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Oct;26(7):805-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1801-z. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
4
Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review.物理检查在诊断神经根型颈椎病中的价值:系统评价。
Spine J. 2018 Jan;18(1):179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Reliability and validity of clinical tests to assess the anatomical integrity of the cervical spine in adults with neck pain and its associated disorders: Part 1-A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration.评估颈痛及相关疾病成人颈椎解剖结构完整性的临床检查的可靠性和有效性:第1部分——来自颈椎评估与诊断研究评估(CADRE)协作组的系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2225-2241. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5153-0. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
Differentiation of Osteophytes and Disc Herniations in Spinal Radiculopathy Using Susceptibility-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.利用磁敏感加权磁共振成像鉴别脊柱神经根病中的骨赘和椎间盘突出症
Invest Radiol. 2017 Feb;52(2):75-80. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000314.
7
Comparison of Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Kinematics after Posterior Full-endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy and Discectomy According to Preoperative Cervical Alignment.根据术前颈椎排列情况比较后路全内镜下颈椎椎间孔切开术和椎间盘切除术后颈椎矢状位排列及运动学变化
Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2):77-87.
8
Anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radicular disease.前路颈椎椎间孔切开术治疗单侧神经根病。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Apr 15;25(8):905-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200004150-00002.
9
Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain.对下背痛患者因椎间盘突出导致的腰椎神经根病进行体格检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17(2):CD007431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2.
10
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy.一项关于颈部激发试验诊断神经根型颈椎病诊断准确性的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):307-19. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6. Epub 2006 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a physiotherapy-directed rehabilitation programme on patients with multidirectional instability of the glenohumeral joint: a multimodal interventional MRI study protocol.多向性肩盂肱关节不稳定患者的物理治疗导向康复方案的效果:一项多模态介入性 MRI 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e071287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071287.
2
Rethinking neck-related arm pain: hypothetical clinical scenarios to differentiate the underlying IASP-defined pain mechanisms.重新思考与颈部相关的手臂疼痛:假设临床情况以区分潜在的 IASP 定义的疼痛机制。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Aug;32(4):378-389. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2292909. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Spurling's test - inconsistencies in clinical practice.
斯伯林试验-临床实践中的不一致性。
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Feb;29(1):23-32. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1762526. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Neck Tornado Test as a New Screening Test in Cervical Radiculopathy.颈龙卷测试作为一种新的颈椎神经根病筛查试验的诊断准确性。
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Jun 23;14(7):662-667. doi: 10.7150/ijms.19110. eCollection 2017.
5
Shoulder pain due to cervical radiculopathy: an underestimated long-term complication of herpes zoster virus reactivation?颈神经根病所致肩部疼痛:带状疱疹病毒再激活的一种被低估的长期并发症?
Int Orthop. 2018 Jan;42(1):157-160. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3593-0. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
Cervical radiculopathy combined with cervical myelopathy: prevalence and characteristics.神经根型颈椎病合并脊髓型颈椎病:患病率及特征
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Oct;27(7):889-893. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1972-2. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Effect of exercise-based management on multidirectional instability of the glenohumeral joint: a pilot randomised controlled trial protocol.基于运动的管理对肩肱关节多向不稳定的影响:一项初步随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 12;6(9):e013083. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013083.
8
Scanning pattern of diffusion tensor tractography and an analysis of the morphology and function of spinal nerve roots.弥散张量纤维束成像扫描模式及脊神经根形态与功能分析。
Neural Regen Res. 2013 Nov 25;8(33):3159-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.33.010.
9
The value of provocative tests in diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.激发试验在诊断神经根型颈椎病中的价值。
J Res Med Sci. 2013 Mar;18(Suppl 1):S35-8.
10
What is the best way to apply the Spurling test for cervical radiculopathy?施氏试验(Spurling test)用于颈椎神经根病的最佳操作方法是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2566-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2492-3. Epub 2012 Jul 18.