Chao Stephanie D, Maibach Howard I
Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0989, USA.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(2):105-11. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200506020-00005.
Systemic treatments that have significant efficacy for dermatologic conditions can often cause severe adverse reactions when improperly combined with interacting drugs. We have noted discrepancies in the reporting of such drug-drug interactions among major drug compendia used in hospitals and physicians' offices.
The aim of this study was to compare the consistency of drug-drug interaction listings among four of the most widely used English language drug compendia in the US.
Drug monographs from Mosby's GenRx, USP DI, AHFS Drug Information, and the Physicians' Desk Reference were compared. The respective drug-drug interactions provided by the various compendia for four systemic agents -- dapsone, erythromycin, methotrexate and prednisone -- commonly prescribed for dermatologic purposes were compiled.
We found considerable discrepancies among the compendia with respect to the number of drug interactions listed. Agreement among the compendia was especially poor when more than two sources were compared.
There is a need for a drug compendium that reconciles drug-drug interaction reporting discrepancies under standardized criteria based on the scientific literature and clinical significance.
对皮肤病具有显著疗效的全身治疗药物在与相互作用的药物不当联合使用时,常常会引起严重的不良反应。我们注意到,医院和医生办公室使用的主要药物手册在报告此类药物相互作用方面存在差异。
本研究旨在比较美国最广泛使用的四种英语药物手册中药物相互作用列表的一致性。
比较了《莫斯比药物指南》(Mosby's GenRx)、《美国药典药物信息》(USP DI)、《美国医院处方集服务处药物信息》(AHFS Drug Information)和《医师案头参考》(Physicians' Desk Reference)中的药物专论。汇总了各手册针对四种常用于皮肤病治疗的全身用药——氨苯砜、红霉素、甲氨蝶呤和泼尼松——提供的各自的药物相互作用信息。
我们发现各手册在列出的药物相互作用数量方面存在相当大的差异。当比较两个以上的来源时,各手册之间的一致性尤其差。
需要一本基于科学文献和临床意义,按照标准化标准协调药物相互作用报告差异的药物手册。