Suppr超能文献

美国主要药品药典中潜在肝毒性药物的比较。

Comparison of potentially hepatotoxic drugs among major US drug compendia.

作者信息

Guo Jeff J, Wigle Patricia R, Lammers Kangsan, Vu Oceana

机构信息

University of Cincinnati College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 3225 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0004, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2005 Sep;1(3):460-79. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.06.005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a large number of drugs include warnings or listed adverse reactions that describe reports of associated hepatotoxicity, the hepatotoxic risk is documented with different definitions in major drug compendia.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to compare inclusion of potentially hepatotoxic drugs, and analyze the ratings of hepatotoxic risk among major drug compendia.

METHODS

To assess the risk of drug-associated hepatotoxicity, we used current literature of epidemiological studies and developed a 4-level rating scale of hepatotoxic drugs: 3, clear literature evidence of life-threatening hepatotoxicity; 2, multiple case reports or significant liver injuries; 1, no significant liver damage has been reported; and 0, no information. All drugs were evaluated using the 5 major US drug compendia: American Hospital Formulary Service (AHFS), United States Pharmacopeia Drug Information (USPDI), Facts and Comparisons (F&C), Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR), and Clinical Pharmacology (CP). Average rating scores were calculated as the sum of each drug rating score divided by the total number of drugs. One-way analysis of variance and independent t tests were conducted to compare the difference among the rating scores.

RESULTS

In total, 175 different drugs and 3 therapeutic classes with hepatotoxic effects were identified in the compendia, including 59 antineoplastics, 28 anti-infectives, 17 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 17 antipsychotics or phenothiazine derivatives, 9 angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, 6 anticonvulsants, 4 histamine-2 receptor antagonists, and other drugs. Average rating scores were 1.65 for AHFS, 1.10 for USPDI, 1.27 for F&C, 1.34 for PDR, and 1.61 for CP (F=7.93, P<.0001). The risk categories were significantly different among compendia in 4 therapeutic classes of antipsychotics and/or phenothiazines (F=3.471, P=.011), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (F=7.866, P<.0001), antineoplastics (F=2.476, P=.044), anti-infectives (F=2.003, P=.098), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (F=38.125, P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rating scores of hepatotoxicity were significantly different among drug compendia. The different compendium put different emphasis on hepatotoxicity severity. Comprehensive evaluations of hepatotoxic-related drugs provide critical information for health practitioners.

摘要

背景

尽管大量药物包含有关肝毒性报告的警告或列出的不良反应,但主要药物汇编中对肝毒性风险的记录采用了不同的定义。

目的

本研究的目的是比较潜在肝毒性药物的收录情况,并分析主要药物汇编中肝毒性风险的评级。

方法

为评估药物相关肝毒性的风险,我们使用了当前的流行病学研究文献,并制定了一个肝毒性药物的4级评级量表:3级,有明确的文献证据表明存在危及生命的肝毒性;2级,多个病例报告或显著的肝损伤;1级,未报告有显著的肝损伤;0级,无相关信息。使用美国5部主要药物汇编对所有药物进行评估:《美国医院药品集》(AHFS)、《美国药典药物信息》(USPDI)、《事实与比较》(F&C)、《医师案头参考》(PDR)和《临床药理学》(CP)。平均评级分数的计算方法是将每种药物的评级分数总和除以药物总数。进行单因素方差分析和独立t检验以比较评级分数之间的差异。

结果

在这些汇编中总共鉴定出175种不同的具有肝毒性作用的药物和3个治疗类别,包括59种抗肿瘤药、28种抗感染药、17种非甾体抗炎药、17种抗精神病药或吩噻嗪衍生物、9种血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、6种抗惊厥药、4种组胺-2受体拮抗剂以及其他药物。AHFS的平均评级分数为1.65,USPDI为1.10,F&C为1.27,PDR为1.34,CP为1.61(F = 7.93,P <.0001)。在抗精神病药和/或吩噻嗪类药物、非甾体抗炎药、抗肿瘤药、抗感染药和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂这4个治疗类别中,各汇编之间的风险类别存在显著差异(抗精神病药和/或吩噻嗪类药物:F = 3.471,P =.011;非甾体抗炎药:F = 7.866,P <.0001;抗肿瘤药:F = 2.476,P =.044;抗感染药:F = 2.003,P =.098;血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:F = 38.125,P <.0001)。

结论

各药物汇编之间肝毒性的评级分数存在显著差异。不同的汇编对肝毒性严重程度的重视程度不同。对肝毒性相关药物的综合评估为医疗从业者提供了关键信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验