Bangs Mark E, Hazell Philip, Danckaerts Marina, Hoare Peter, Coghill David R, Wehmeier Peter M, Williams David W, Moore Rodney J, Levine Louise
Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA.
Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e314-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1880.
In this study we examined the effectiveness of atomoxetine for the treatment of oppositional defiant disorder comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Patients were aged 6 to 12 years and met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with a Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale-Revised attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subscale score above age and gender norms; Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale score of > or = 4; and Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale-Revised oppositional defiant disorder subscale score of > or = 15. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive 1.2 mg/kg per day of atomoxetine (n = 156) or placebo (n = 70) for 8 weeks. Treatment effect on oppositional defiant disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms was measured by using the investigator-rated Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale-Revised.
Repeated-measures analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference favoring atomoxetine over placebo in the reduction of Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale-Revised oppositional defiant disorder total scores. There were significant pairwise treatment differences at weeks 2 and 5 but not at week 8 postbaseline. A last-observation-carried-forward analysis showed Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale-Revised scores at endpoint for the atomoxetine and placebo groups were significantly different for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms but not for oppositional defiant disorder symptoms. Atomoxetine was superior to placebo in a last-observation-carried-forward analysis of Clinical Global Impression-Improvement and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores.
This study confirms previous findings that patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid oppositional defiant disorder show statistically and clinically significant improvement in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and global clinical functioning when treated with atomoxetine. It remains uncertain, however, whether atomoxetine exerts a specific and enduring effect on oppositional defiant disorder symptoms.
在本研究中,我们考察了托莫西汀治疗合并注意缺陷多动障碍的对立违抗性障碍的有效性。
患者年龄为6至12岁,符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版中注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断标准,且斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆评定量表修订版注意缺陷多动障碍分量表得分高于年龄和性别常模;临床总体印象-严重程度量表得分≥4;斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆评定量表修订版对立违抗性障碍分量表得分≥15。患者按2:1的比例随机分配,接受为期8周的每日1.2mg/kg托莫西汀治疗(n = 156)或安慰剂治疗(n = 70)。使用研究者评定的斯旺森-诺兰-佩勒姆评定量表修订版来测量对立违抗性障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍症状的治疗效果。
重复测量分析显示,在降低斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆评定量表修订版对立违抗性障碍总分方面,托莫西汀组相对于安慰剂组有统计学上的显著差异。在基线后第2周和第5周有显著的两两治疗差异,但在第8周没有。末次观察结转分析显示,托莫西汀组和安慰剂组在终点时斯旺森、诺兰和佩勒姆评定量表修订版注意缺陷多动障碍症状得分有显著差异,但对立违抗性障碍症状得分无显著差异。在临床总体印象-改善和临床总体印象-严重程度得分的末次观察结转分析中,托莫西汀优于安慰剂。
本研究证实以前的研究结果,即合并对立违抗性障碍的注意缺陷多动障碍患者在接受托莫西汀治疗时,注意缺陷多动障碍症状和总体临床功能在统计学和临床上有显著改善。然而,托莫西汀是否对对立违抗性障碍症状产生特定和持久的影响仍不确定。