• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧盟的治疗创新:对欧洲药品管理局在1995年至2003年间批准的药物的分析。

Therapeutic innovation in the European Union: analysis of the drugs approved by the EMEA between 1995 and 2003.

作者信息

Motola Domenico, De Ponti Fabrizio, Rossi Pasqualino, Martini Nello, Montanaro Nicola

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Interuniversity Research Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;59(4):475-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02320.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02320.x
PMID:15801943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1884813/
Abstract

Since January 1995, all European Union applications for marketing approval for medicinal products derived from biotechnology and other drugs considered potentially innovative follow the EMEA centralized procedure. In order to assess the overall degree of therapeutic innovation of these drugs, we considered, for each approved agent, its target, the availability of previous treatments and the extent of its therapeutic effect. The following scores for therapeutic innovation were assigned through a consensus process: 'A' (important), 'B' (moderate) and 'C' (modest). The overall degree of important/moderate therapeutic innovation was 47% of all therapeutic agents (32% important; 15% moderate). Most (80%) of the EMEA-approved therapeutic agents were for serious diseases. The remaining ones were for risk factors (7%) or nonserious diseases (13%).

摘要

自1995年1月起,所有欧盟关于源自生物技术的药品以及其他被视为具有潜在创新性的药物的上市许可申请均遵循欧洲药品管理局(EMEA)的集中程序。为了评估这些药物的总体治疗创新程度,对于每一种获批药物,我们考量了其靶点、既往治疗方法的可及性以及治疗效果的程度。通过共识过程赋予了以下治疗创新分数:“A”(重要)、“B”(中等)和“C”(适度)。重要/中等治疗创新的总体程度占所有治疗药物的47%(重要的占32%;中等的占15%)。欧洲药品管理局批准的大多数(80%)治疗药物用于治疗严重疾病。其余的用于风险因素(7%)或非严重疾病(13%)。

相似文献

1
Therapeutic innovation in the European Union: analysis of the drugs approved by the EMEA between 1995 and 2003.欧盟的治疗创新:对欧洲药品管理局在1995年至2003年间批准的药物的分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;59(4):475-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02320.x.
2
An update on the first decade of the European centralized procedure: how many innovative drugs?欧洲集中程序首个十年的最新情况:有多少创新药物?
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;62(5):610-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02700.x. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
3
[European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products: five years experience].[欧洲药品评估局:五年经验]
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg. 2000;155(5-6):254-8; discussion 259-62.
4
Pharmaceutical biotechnology products approved within the European Union.在欧盟范围内获批的医药生物技术产品。
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003 Jan;55(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/s0939-6411(02)00165-0.
5
Registries supporting new drug applications.支持新药申请的注册。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1451-1457. doi: 10.1002/pds.4332. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
6
[Registration of new medicinal products in Europe].[欧洲新药品注册]
Onkologie. 2008;31 Suppl 2:64-6. doi: 10.1159/000113448. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
7
Post-approval safety issues with innovative drugs: a European cohort study.新药审批后安全性问题:一项欧洲队列研究。
Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;36(11):1105-15. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0094-y.
8
Clinical trials for registration in the European Union: the EMEA 5-year experience in oncology.欧盟注册临床试验:欧洲药品管理局肿瘤学领域5年经验
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002 May;42(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(02)00009-4.
9
Medicines for children licensed by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products.欧洲药品评估局批准的儿童用药。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;58(8):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00228-002-0511-0. Epub 2002 Sep 25.
10
[New drugs and European procedures of approval. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products' role].[新药与欧洲审批程序。欧洲药品评估局的作用]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1648-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulatory policy and pharmaceutical innovation in the United Kingdom after Brexit: Initial insights.脱欧后英国的监管政策与制药创新:初步见解
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 15;9:1011082. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1011082. eCollection 2022.
2
Level of therapeutic innovation from the registration studies of the new drugs for the prophylaxis of migraine.预防偏头痛新药注册研究的治疗创新水平。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022 Dec;47(12):2130-2139. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13760. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
3
How innovation can be defined, evaluated and rewarded in health technology assessment.在卫生技术评估中,创新如何被定义、评估和奖励。
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jan 3;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00342-y.
4
Registries supporting new drug applications.支持新药申请的注册。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):1451-1457. doi: 10.1002/pds.4332. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
5
Antidepressant-induced Dopamine Receptor Dysregulation: A Valid Animal Model of Manic-Depressive Illness.抗抑郁药诱发的多巴胺受体失调:躁郁症的一种有效动物模型。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2017 Apr;15(3):417-423. doi: 10.2174/1570159X14666160715165648.
6
Do the EMA accelerated assessment procedure and the FDA priority review ensure a therapeutic added value? 2006-2015: a cohort study.欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的加速评估程序和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的优先审评能否确保治疗附加值?2006 - 2015年:一项队列研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;72(10):1275-1281. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2104-3. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
7
How innovative are new drugs launched in the UK? A retrospective study of new drugs listed in the British National Formulary (BNF) 2001-2012.在英国上市的新药创新程度如何?对《英国国家处方集》(BNF)2001 - 2012年列出的新药进行的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 24;4(10):e006235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006235.
8
Assessment of the therapeutic value of new medicines marketed in Australia.对在澳大利亚上市的新药的治疗价值评估。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2013 Jun 13;6:2. doi: 10.1186/2052-3211-6-2. eCollection 2013.
9
Post-approval safety issues with innovative drugs: a European cohort study.新药审批后安全性问题:一项欧洲队列研究。
Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;36(11):1105-15. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0094-y.
10
The most transformative drugs of the past 25 years: a survey of physicians.过去 25 年最具变革性的药物:医生调查。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Jun;12(6):425-31. doi: 10.1038/nrd3977. Epub 2013 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
New Antiretroviral Agents for the Treatment of HIV Infection.用于治疗HIV感染的新型抗逆转录病毒药物
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2004 Aug;6(4):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s11908-004-0056-8.
2
Efficacy, safety and cost of new cardiovascular drugs: a survey.新型心血管药物的疗效、安全性及成本:一项调查
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Nov;59(8-9):701-6. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0634-y. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
3
Efficacy, safety and cost of new drugs acting on the central nervous system.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 May;59(1):79-84. doi: 10.1007/s00228-003-0569-3. Epub 2003 Mar 22.
4
Efficacy, safety, and cost of new anticancer drugs.新型抗癌药物的疗效、安全性及成本
BMJ. 2002 Aug 3;325(7358):269-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7358.269.
5
Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.生物标志物与替代终点:首选定义及概念框架
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Mar;69(3):89-95. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989.
6
Lifestyle medicines.生活方式医学
BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1341-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1341.