Contreras G, Tozman E, Nahar Nilay, Metz David
Division of Nephrology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida 33136, USA.
Lupus. 2005;14 Suppl 1:s33-8. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2115oa.
For the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis, long-term cyclophosphamide (CY) regimens are efficacious, however, at the expense of substantial toxicity. In the last decade, sequential regimens of short-term CY induction followed by either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (AZA) maintenance have shown to be efficacious and safe reducing the long-term exposure to CY. In a maintenance study including predominantly Hispanics and African-Americans, the patients who received MMF and AZA maintenance had a higher cumulative probability of remaining free of the composite of death or chronic renal failure (CRF) compared to quarterly intravenous CY (IVCY) maintenance (89% in MMF, 80%, in AZA and 45% in IVCY). Likewise, MMF and AZA maintenance were associated with significantly lower incidence of severe infections (2% in each MMF or AZA, and 25% in IVCY), sustained amenorrhea (6% in MMF, 8% in AZA, and 32% in IVCY), and hospitalizations (one hospital-days per patient-year in each MMF or AZA, and 10 in IVCY). In a European induction study including predominantly Caucasians, patients who received any of two sequential regimens, low dose versus high dose IVCY induction both followed by AZA maintenance, had a high cumulative probability of remaining free of treatment failure (84% in low dose IVCY and 80% in high dose IVCY; treatment failure defined as a composite of free of corticosteroid resistant flare, nephrotic syndrome, doubling creatinine, and persistent elevated creatinine). Low dose IVCY and high dose IVCY induction were associated with low incidence of sustained amenorrhea (4% in each group) and severe infections (11% in low dose and 22% in high dose IVCY induction). Of interest, most of the severe infection episodes occurred while patients were receiving IVCY induction. Finally an Asian study demonstrated that patients with proliferative lupus nephritis could be effectively treated with short-term oral CY induction followed by AZA maintenance. The cumulative probability of complete remission was 76%. The relapse rate was only 11%. The incidence of permanent amenorrhea and infection were 8% and 33%, respectively. None of the Asian patients had an increase in serum creatinine level to double the baseline value. Maintenance therapies with MMF or AZA following short-term CY induction in a sequential regimen are efficacious and safe for the treatment of high-risk patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.
对于增殖性狼疮性肾炎的治疗,长期使用环磷酰胺(CY)方案是有效的,然而,这是以相当大的毒性为代价的。在过去十年中,短期CY诱导序贯霉酚酸酯(MMF)或硫唑嘌呤(AZA)维持治疗方案已被证明是有效且安全的,可减少长期接触CY。在一项主要纳入西班牙裔和非裔美国人的维持治疗研究中,接受MMF和AZA维持治疗的患者与每季度静脉注射CY(IVCY)维持治疗相比,无死亡或慢性肾衰竭(CRF)复合终点的累积概率更高(MMF组为89%,AZA组为80%,IVCY组为45%)。同样,MMF和AZA维持治疗与严重感染的发生率显著较低相关(MMF或AZA组各为2%,IVCY组为25%)、持续性闭经(MMF组为6%,AZA组为8%,IVCY组为32%)以及住院率(MMF或AZA组每位患者每年1个住院日,IVCY组为10个住院日)。在一项主要纳入白种人的欧洲诱导治疗研究中,接受两种序贯方案(低剂量与高剂量IVCY诱导后均序贯AZA维持治疗)中任何一种的患者,无治疗失败的累积概率较高(低剂量IVCY组为84%,高剂量IVCY组为80%;治疗失败定义为无糖皮质激素抵抗性病情复发、肾病综合征、肌酐翻倍以及持续性肌酐升高的复合情况)。低剂量IVCY和高剂量IVCY诱导与持续性闭经的发生率较低(每组均为4%)以及严重感染的发生率较低相关(低剂量组为11%,高剂量IVCY诱导组为22%)。有趣的是,大多数严重感染发作发生在患者接受IVCY诱导治疗期间。最后,一项亚洲研究表明,增殖性狼疮性肾炎患者可通过短期口服CY诱导序贯AZA维持治疗得到有效治疗。完全缓解的累积概率为76%。复发率仅为11%。永久性闭经和感染的发生率分别为8%和33%。亚洲患者中无一例血清肌酐水平升高至基线值的两倍。在序贯方案中短期CY诱导后使用MMF或AZA进行维持治疗,对于增殖性狼疮性肾炎高危患者的治疗是有效且安全的。