Schoonenboom S N M, Visser P J, Mulder C, Lindeboom J, Van Elk E J, Van Kamp G J, Scheltens P H
Department of Neurology Alzheimer Centre, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Neurocase. 2005 Feb;11(1):8-13. doi: 10.1080/13554790490896785.
The aim of the study was to compare clinical variables between MCI patients at different risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) according to their biomarker profile. Fifty-four percent out of 39 MCI patients had a low Abeta42 and high tau in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (high-risk), 26% either a low CSF Abeta32 or high CSF tau (intermediate-risk) and 20% a normal CSF Abeta42 and tau (low-risk). Both high-and intermediate-risk subjects differed from the low-risk group in episodic memory, executive functions and the preclinical AD scale (PAS),which combines a set of clinical parameters. Subjects at high risk did not differ from subjects with an intermediate risk. Abeta42 levels correlated with the MTA and PAS scores, tau levels with episodic memory. These correlations suggest that the biomarkers are not independent when compared to the other AD markers. Longitudinal studies are necessary to interpret the correlations between biomarkers, imaging, and neuropsychological markers.
该研究的目的是根据生物标志物特征,比较不同阿尔茨海默病(AD)风险的轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者之间的临床变量。39名MCI患者中,54%的患者脑脊液(CSF)中β淀粉样蛋白42(Abeta42)水平低且tau蛋白水平高(高风险),26%的患者CSF中Abeta32水平低或tau蛋白水平高(中度风险),20%的患者CSF中Abeta42和tau蛋白水平正常(低风险)。高风险和中度风险受试者在情景记忆、执行功能以及结合了一组临床参数的临床前期AD量表(PAS)方面与低风险组不同。高风险受试者与中度风险受试者无差异。Abeta42水平与脑萎缩评定量表(MTA)和PAS评分相关,tau蛋白水平与情景记忆相关。这些相关性表明,与其他AD标志物相比,生物标志物并非独立存在。需要进行纵向研究来解释生物标志物、影像学和神经心理学标志物之间的相关性。