Baumert J-H, Hecker K E, Hein M, Reyle-Hahn S M, Horn N A, Rossaint R
Klinik fuer Anaesthesiologie, Universitaetsklinikum Aaachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jun;94(6):727-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei127. Epub 2005 Apr 1.
It was hypothesized that xenon would stabilize mean arterial pressure (MAP) in haemorrhagic shock, recovery, and volume resuscitation, because a higher MAP has been observed with xenon, when compared with isoflurane anaesthesia. The responses to haemorrhage and subsequent volume replacement were therefore compared between xenon and isoflurane anaesthesia, in pigs.
Pigs were randomized to anaesthesia with xenon 0.55 MAC (group Xe, n=9) or isoflurane 0.55 MAC (group Iso, n=9), each with remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). MAP, heart rate, cardiac output (CO), and left ventricular fractional area change (FAC) were collected at control (1), after haemorrhage (20 ml kg(-1)) (2), after 10 min of recovery (3), after volume replacement (4), and 30 min later (5). Data were analysed by two-way repeated measures anova.
Blood loss decreased MAP (Xe: 103 [21] to 53 [24] mm Hg; Iso: 92 [18] to 55 [14] mm Hg) and CO (Xe: 4.1 [0.8] to 2.6 [0.5] litre min(-1); Iso: 5.1 [1.1] to 3.8 [1.2] litre min(-1)), in spite of significant tachycardia. MAP and CO recovered to about 75% of control, and subsequent volume replacement completely reversed symptoms in both groups, but increased FAC only with xenon.
Haemodynamic response to acute haemorrhage appeared faster with xenon/remifentanil than with isoflurane/remifentanil anaesthesia. In particular MAP decrease and short-term recovery were more marked with xenon (P<0.02). In the xenon group, volume replacement increased FAC compared with control and isoflurane (P<0.02).
有假设认为,氙气可使失血性休克、复苏及容量复苏过程中的平均动脉压(MAP)保持稳定,因为与异氟烷麻醉相比,使用氙气时观察到较高的MAP。因此,研究人员在猪身上比较了氙气麻醉和异氟烷麻醉对出血及随后容量补充的反应。
将猪随机分为接受0.55MAC氙气麻醉组(Xe组,n = 9)或0.55MAC异氟烷麻醉组(Iso组,n = 9),每组均使用瑞芬太尼0.5μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹。在以下时间点收集MAP、心率、心输出量(CO)和左心室面积变化分数(FAC):对照期(1)、出血后(20ml·kg⁻¹)(2)、恢复10分钟后(3)、容量补充后(4)以及30分钟后(5)。数据采用双向重复测量方差分析。
尽管出现明显心动过速,但失血使MAP(Xe组:从103[21]降至53[24]mmHg;Iso组:从92[18]降至55[14]mmHg)和CO(Xe组:从4.1[0.8]降至2.6[0.5]L·min⁻¹;Iso组:从5.1[1.1]降至3.8[1.2]L·min⁻¹)降低。MAP和CO恢复至对照值的约75%,随后的容量补充使两组症状完全逆转,但仅氙气组FAC增加。
与异氟烷/瑞芬太尼麻醉相比,氙气/瑞芬太尼麻醉对急性出血的血流动力学反应似乎更快。特别是氙气组MAP降低和短期恢复更为明显(P<0.02)。在氙气组中,与对照组和异氟烷组相比,容量补充使FAC增加(P<0.02)。