Suppr超能文献

氙气麻醉对低通气循环反应的影响。

Effects of xenon anaesthesia on the circulatory response to hypoventilation.

作者信息

Baumert J-H, Hecker K E, Hein M, Reyle-Hahn M, Horn N A, Rossaint R

机构信息

Anaesthesiology Clinic, Universitaetsklinikum Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2005 Aug;95(2):166-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei153. Epub 2005 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Circulatory response to hypoventilation is aimed at eliminating carbon dioxide and maintaining oxygen delivery (DO(2)) by increasing cardiac output (CO). The hypothesis that this increase is more pronounced with xenon than with isoflurane anaesthesia was tested in pigs.

METHODS

Twenty pigs received anaesthesia with xenon 0.55 MAC/remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) (group X, n=10) or isoflurane 0.55 MAC/remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1)min(-1) (group I, n=10). CO, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and left ventricular fractional area change (FAC) were measured at baseline, after 5 and 15 min of hypoventilation and after 5, 15 and 30 min of restored ventilation.

RESULTS

CO increased by 10-20% with both anaesthetics, with an equivalent rise in HR, maintaining DO(2) in spite of a 20% reduction in arterial oxygen content. Decreased left ventricular (LV) afterload during hypoventilation increased FAC, and this was more marked with xenon (0.60-0.66, P<0.05 compared with baseline and isoflurane). This difference is attributed to negative inotropic effects of isoflurane. Increased pulmonary vascular resistance during hypoventilation was found with both anaesthetics.

CONCLUSION

The cardiovascular effects observed in this model of moderate hypoventilation were sufficient to maintain DO(2). Although the haemodynamic response appeared more pronounced with xenon, differences were not clinically relevant. An increase in FAC with xenon is attributed to its lack of negative inotropic effects.

摘要

背景

对通气不足的循环反应旨在通过增加心输出量(CO)来消除二氧化碳并维持氧输送(DO₂)。在猪身上测试了氙气麻醉比异氟烷麻醉时这种增加更明显的假设。

方法

20头猪接受0.55 MAC氙气/瑞芬太尼0.5微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹麻醉(X组,n = 10)或0.55 MAC异氟烷/瑞芬太尼0.5微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹麻醉(I组,n = 10)。在基线、通气不足5分钟和15分钟后以及通气恢复5分钟、15分钟和30分钟后测量CO、心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)和左心室面积变化分数(FAC)。

结果

两种麻醉剂均使CO增加10% - 20%,HR也有同等程度升高,尽管动脉血氧含量降低20%,仍维持了DO₂。通气不足期间左心室(LV)后负荷降低使FAC增加,氙气麻醉时更明显(0.60 - 0.66,与基线和异氟烷相比P < 0.05)。这种差异归因于异氟烷的负性肌力作用。两种麻醉剂在通气不足期间均发现肺血管阻力增加。

结论

在这种中度通气不足模型中观察到的心血管效应足以维持DO₂。尽管氙气的血流动力学反应似乎更明显,但差异无临床相关性。氙气使FAC增加归因于其缺乏负性肌力作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验