Yao Shuqiao, Yi Jinyao, Zhu Xiongzhao, Haviland Mark G
The Medical Psychological Research Center, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, Changsha, China.
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Mar 30;134(1):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.010.
The purpose of the present study was to develop a Chinese translation of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS-C) and evaluate its reliability and factorial validity. The original English-version of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS) was translated into Chinese and given to 468 Chinese undergraduate students. Students were asked to rate a person (other than themselves) whom they knew well (e.g., a parent, sibling, another relative, or friend). We evaluated internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability, and factorial validity. Average OAS-C scores were slightly higher than, but comparable to, OAS scores in the normative samples (English-speaking/nonclinical). The OAS-C showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.84, and the mean inter-item correlation coefficient was 0.14), good stability (test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval was 0.90), and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.78). Moreover, the OAS five-factor model (Distant, Uninsightful, Somatizing, Humorless, and Rigid) was confirmed: incremental fit index=0.905, comparative fit index=0.904, and root mean square error of approximation=0.086; each represented an adequate model fit. The OAS-C appears to be a reliable and valid observer-rated alexithymia measure. We recommend that researchers collect both self- and observer-rated alexithymia data and, when possible, obtain observer reports from more than one person.
本研究的目的是开发中文版的观察者述情障碍量表(OAS-C)并评估其信度和因子效度。将原版英文观察者述情障碍量表(OAS)翻译成中文,并施测于468名中国本科生。要求学生对他们非常了解的一个人(非他们自己)进行评分(例如,父母、兄弟姐妹、其他亲属或朋友)。我们评估了内部一致性、重测信度和评分者间信度以及因子效度。OAS-C的平均得分略高于常模样本(说英语的非临床人群)中的OAS得分,但二者具有可比性。OAS-C显示出足够的内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数为0.84,平均项目间相关系数为0.14)、良好的稳定性(2周间隔的重测信度为0.90)和评分者间信度(组内相关系数为0.78)。此外,OAS的五因素模型(疏离、缺乏洞察力、躯体化、缺乏幽默感和刻板)得到了证实:增值拟合指数=0.905,比较拟合指数=0.904,近似误差均方根=0.086;每个指标都代表了足够的模型拟合度。OAS-C似乎是一种可靠且有效的观察者评定的述情障碍测量工具。我们建议研究人员同时收集自我评定和观察者评定的述情障碍数据,并尽可能从不止一人那里获得观察者报告。