• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察者述情障碍量表中文译本的信度与因素效度

Reliability and factorial validity of the Observer Alexithymia Scale-Chinese translation.

作者信息

Yao Shuqiao, Yi Jinyao, Zhu Xiongzhao, Haviland Mark G

机构信息

The Medical Psychological Research Center, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2005 Mar 30;134(1):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.010.

DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.010
PMID:15808294
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to develop a Chinese translation of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS-C) and evaluate its reliability and factorial validity. The original English-version of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS) was translated into Chinese and given to 468 Chinese undergraduate students. Students were asked to rate a person (other than themselves) whom they knew well (e.g., a parent, sibling, another relative, or friend). We evaluated internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability, and factorial validity. Average OAS-C scores were slightly higher than, but comparable to, OAS scores in the normative samples (English-speaking/nonclinical). The OAS-C showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.84, and the mean inter-item correlation coefficient was 0.14), good stability (test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval was 0.90), and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.78). Moreover, the OAS five-factor model (Distant, Uninsightful, Somatizing, Humorless, and Rigid) was confirmed: incremental fit index=0.905, comparative fit index=0.904, and root mean square error of approximation=0.086; each represented an adequate model fit. The OAS-C appears to be a reliable and valid observer-rated alexithymia measure. We recommend that researchers collect both self- and observer-rated alexithymia data and, when possible, obtain observer reports from more than one person.

摘要

本研究的目的是开发中文版的观察者述情障碍量表(OAS-C)并评估其信度和因子效度。将原版英文观察者述情障碍量表(OAS)翻译成中文,并施测于468名中国本科生。要求学生对他们非常了解的一个人(非他们自己)进行评分(例如,父母、兄弟姐妹、其他亲属或朋友)。我们评估了内部一致性、重测信度和评分者间信度以及因子效度。OAS-C的平均得分略高于常模样本(说英语的非临床人群)中的OAS得分,但二者具有可比性。OAS-C显示出足够的内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数为0.84,平均项目间相关系数为0.14)、良好的稳定性(2周间隔的重测信度为0.90)和评分者间信度(组内相关系数为0.78)。此外,OAS的五因素模型(疏离、缺乏洞察力、躯体化、缺乏幽默感和刻板)得到了证实:增值拟合指数=0.905,比较拟合指数=0.904,近似误差均方根=0.086;每个指标都代表了足够的模型拟合度。OAS-C似乎是一种可靠且有效的观察者评定的述情障碍测量工具。我们建议研究人员同时收集自我评定和观察者评定的述情障碍数据,并尽可能从不止一人那里获得观察者报告。

相似文献

1
Reliability and factorial validity of the Observer Alexithymia Scale-Chinese translation.观察者述情障碍量表中文译本的信度与因素效度
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Mar 30;134(1):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.010.
2
Assessing alexithymia in French-speaking samples: psychometric properties of the Observer Alexithymia Scale-French translation.评估法语样本中的述情障碍:观察者述情障碍量表法语翻译版的心理测量特性。
Eur Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;20(7):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2004.10.001. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
3
An observer scale to measure alexithymia.一种用于测量述情障碍的观察量表。
Psychosomatics. 2000 Sep-Oct;41(5):385-92. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.41.5.385.
4
The Observer Alexithymia Scale: a reliable and valid alternative for alexithymia measurement?《观察者躯体化量表》:一种可靠且有效的躯体化测量方法?
J Pers Assess. 2010 Mar;92(2):175-85. doi: 10.1080/00223890903510449.
5
Psychometric properties of the Observer Alexithymia Scale in a clinical sample.
J Pers Assess. 2001 Aug;77(1):176-86. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7701_12.
6
Cross-cultural validation of a Chinese translation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale.20项多伦多述情障碍量表中文译本的跨文化效度验证
Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Sep-Oct;48(5):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
7
The German version of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity in a psychiatric patient sample.多伦多述情障碍结构化访谈德语版:精神科患者样本中的因子结构、信度和同时效度
Compr Psychiatry. 2009 Sep-Oct;50(5):424-30. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
8
Observer- and self-rated alexithymia in eating disorder patients: levels and correspondence among three measures.饮食失调患者的观察者评定和自评述情障碍:三种测量方法的水平及相关性
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Mar;62(3):341-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.10.008.
9
Assessing alexithymia and emotional awareness: relations between measures in a German non-clinical sample.评估述情障碍和情绪意识:德国非临床样本中各项测量指标之间的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):952-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.12.013. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
10
Multimethod alexithymia assessment in adolescents and young adults with a cannabis use disorder.对患有大麻使用障碍的青少年和青年进行多方法述情障碍评估。
Compr Psychiatry. 2008 Nov-Dec;49(6):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
When parenting fails: alexithymia and attachment states of mind in mothers of female patients with eating disorders.当养育失败时:饮食失调女性患者母亲的述情障碍与依恋心理状态
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 12;6:1145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01145. eCollection 2015.
2
Development of alexithymic personality features.发展成述情障碍人格特征。
World J Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 22;4(4):91-102. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v4.i4.91.
3
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.双因子模型和旋转:探索多维数据产生单一尺度分数的程度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.