Dorard Géraldine, Berthoz Sylvie, Haviland Mark G, Phan Olivier, Corcos Maurice, Bungener Catherine
Laboratory of Clinical Psychopathology and Neuropsychology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Compr Psychiatry. 2008 Nov-Dec;49(6):585-92. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
The value of alexithymia assessments in medical and psychiatric research is well documented, but such assessments in cannabis abusers are scarce. Moreover, despite repeated calls for multimethod alexithymia evaluations, researchers typically use 1 self-report only: the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Herein, we evaluated (1) the psychometric properties of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS), (2) the correspondence between 3 alexithymia measures, (3) OAS raters' affect and its relationship to OAS scores, and (4) cannabis abusers' alexithymic features. Eighty-seven cannabis abusers completed self-reports measuring alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire-B), depression (13-item Beck Depression Inventory), and anxiety (State and Trait Anxiety Inventory-Form Y) and asked relatives to rate them using the OAS. The raters also completed the self-report scales. The OAS met acceptable reliability and validity standards, with the exception of relatively low interrater reliability for one of its subscales. Rater affect appeared to influence OAS scores, albeit slightly. Patients' OAS scores were higher than scores reported for people-in-general samples and lower than those for outpatient clinical samples. Alexithymia rates were similar to those previously reported in cannabis abusers. Our results demonstrated the adequacy and appropriateness of the OAS in these (and related) clinical samples, which may encourage multimethod alexithymia assessments in both research and clinical practice.
述情障碍评估在医学和精神病学研究中的价值已有充分记录,但在大麻滥用者中的此类评估却很稀少。此外,尽管一再呼吁进行多方法述情障碍评估,但研究人员通常仅使用一种自我报告:20项多伦多述情障碍量表。在此,我们评估了:(1)观察者述情障碍量表(OAS)的心理测量特性;(2)三种述情障碍测量方法之间的对应关系;(3)OAS评分者的情感及其与OAS分数的关系;以及(4)大麻滥用者的述情障碍特征。八十七名大麻滥用者完成了测量述情障碍(多伦多述情障碍量表、伯蒙德 - 沃斯特述情障碍问卷 - B)、抑郁(13项贝克抑郁量表)和焦虑(状态特质焦虑量表 - Y型)的自我报告,并让亲属使用OAS对他们进行评分。评分者也完成了自我报告量表。除了其中一个子量表的评分者间信度相对较低外,OAS达到了可接受的信度和效度标准。评分者的情感似乎对OAS分数有影响,尽管影响较小。患者的OAS分数高于一般人群样本报告的分数,低于门诊临床样本的分数。述情障碍发生率与之前在大麻滥用者中报告的相似。我们的结果证明了OAS在这些(及相关)临床样本中的充分性和适用性,这可能会鼓励在研究和临床实践中进行多方法述情障碍评估。