Suppr超能文献

英国普通人群中沙眼衣原体系统性邮政筛查的覆盖率、接受率及感染患病率:横断面研究

Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study.

作者信息

Macleod John, Salisbury Chris, Low Nicola, McCarthy Anne, Sterne Jonathan A C, Holloway Aisha, Patel Rita, Sanford Emma, Morcom Andrea, Horner Paddy, Davey Smith George, Skidmore Susan, Herring Alan, Caul Owen, Hobbs F D Richard, Egger Matthias

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT.

出版信息

BMJ. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):940. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38413.663137.8F. Epub 2005 Apr 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure the coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and the prevalence of infection in the general population in the United Kingdom. To investigate factors associated with these measures.

DESIGN

Cross sectional survey of people randomly selected from general practice registers. Invitation to provide a specimen collected at home.

SETTING

England.

PARTICIPANTS

19,773 men and women aged 16-39 years invited to participate in screening.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Coverage and uptake of screening; prevalence of chlamydia.

RESULTS

Coverage of chlamydia screening was 73% and was lower in areas with a higher proportion of non-white residents. Uptake in 16-24 year olds was 31.5% and was lower in men, younger adults, and practices in disadvantaged areas. Overall prevalence of chlamydia was 2.8% (95%confidence interval 2.2% to 3.4%) in men and 3.6% (3.1% to 4.9%) in women, but it was higher in people younger than 25 years (men 5.1%; 4.0% to 6.3%; women 6.2%; 5.2% to 7.8%). Prevalence was higher in the subgroup of younger women who were harder to engage in screening. The strongest determinant of chlamydial infection was having one or more new sexual partners in the past year.

CONCLUSIONS

Postal chlamydia screening was feasible, but coverage was incomplete and uptake was modest. Lower coverage of postal screening in areas with more non-white residents along with poorer uptake in more deprived areas and among women at higher risk of infection could mean that screening leads to wider inequalities in sexual health.

摘要

目的

评估英国普通人群中针对沙眼衣原体的系统性邮政筛查的覆盖率、接受率以及感染率。调查与这些指标相关的因素。

设计

从全科医疗登记册中随机选取人员进行横断面调查。邀请参与者在家中提供样本。

地点

英格兰

参与者

19773名年龄在16 - 39岁之间的男性和女性被邀请参与筛查。

主要观察指标

筛查的覆盖率和接受率;衣原体感染率

结果

衣原体筛查的覆盖率为73%,在非白人居民比例较高的地区覆盖率较低。16 - 24岁人群的接受率为31.5%,男性、年轻人以及贫困地区的医疗机构接受率较低。男性衣原体总体感染率为2.8%(95%置信区间2.2%至3.4%),女性为3.6%(3.1%至4.9%),但25岁以下人群感染率更高(男性5.1%;4.0%至6.3%;女性6.2%;5.2%至7.8%)。在较难参与筛查的年轻女性亚组中感染率更高。衣原体感染的最强决定因素是在过去一年中有一个或多个新性伴侣。

结论

邮政衣原体筛查是可行的,但覆盖率不完整且接受率一般。非白人居民较多地区的邮政筛查覆盖率较低,以及较贫困地区和感染风险较高女性的接受率较差,这可能意味着筛查会导致性健康方面更大的不平等。

相似文献

3
Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. doi: 10.3310/hta11080.
6
Implementation of chlamydia screening in a general practice setting: a 6-month pilot study.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2005 Apr;31(2):109-12. doi: 10.1783/1471189053629590.
8
Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London.
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Aug;76(4):273-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.4.273.

引用本文的文献

1
Pilot postal birth cohort hepatitis C virus screening in UK primary care: HepCAPP study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):e122-e128. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0219. Print 2025 Feb.
2
Utilisation of pharmacy-based sexual and reproductive health services: a quantitative retrospective study.
Sex Transm Infect. 2021 Mar;97(2):126-133. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054488. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
4
Does infection with induce long-lasting partial immunity? Insights from mathematical modelling.
Sex Transm Infect. 2019 Mar;95(2):115-121. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053543. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
6
The optimal treatment of an infectious disease with two strains.
J Math Biol. 2017 Jun;74(7):1753-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00285-016-1074-5. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Simple steps to develop trial follow-up procedures.
Trials. 2016 Jan 15;17:28. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1155-1.
10
Home-based versus clinic-based specimen collection in the management of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD011317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011317.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct;80(5):342-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.006197.
3
Bias in chlamydia prevalence surveys.
Lancet. 2003 Oct 4;362(9390):1157-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14480-7.
4
What should we do about screening for genital chlamydia?
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;31(5):891-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.5.891.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验