Suppr超能文献

基于人群的泌尿生殖系统沙眼衣原体感染外展筛查策略:一项随机对照试验

Population-based strategies for outreach screening of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: a randomized, controlled trial.

作者信息

Andersen Berit, Olesen Frede, Møller Jens K, Østergaard Lars

机构信息

Research Unit and Department of General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2002 Jan 15;185(2):252-8. doi: 10.1086/338268. Epub 2002 Jan 3.

Abstract

The effect of 2 population-based outreach screening strategies that used in-home sampling was compared with usual care practices for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. All 30,439 persons 21-23 years old in Aarhus County, Denmark, were divided randomly into 3 groups: group 1 (n=4500) had a home sampling kit mailed directly to their centrally registered home address; group 2 (n=4500) had a reply card mailed to their home address with which a home sampling kit could be ordered; and group 3 (n=21,439) had access to usual care. For women in groups 1 and 2, the relative risks of being tested were 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-4.4) and 3.5 (95% CI, 3.2-3.9), respectively, compared with usual care. The corresponding figures for men were 19.1 (95% CI, 16.0-22.8) and 11.8 (95% CI, 9.8-14.2), respectively. Both screening strategies were highly effective, but men benefited the most from having the home sampling kit provided directly.

摘要

比较了两种基于人群的外展筛查策略(采用上门采样)与沙眼衣原体感染常规护理方法的效果。丹麦奥胡斯郡所有30439名21至23岁的人被随机分为3组:第1组(n = 4500)直接将上门采样试剂盒邮寄到其在中央登记的家庭住址;第2组(n = 4500)将回复卡邮寄到其家庭住址,可据此订购上门采样试剂盒;第3组(n = 21439)接受常规护理。对于第1组和第2组中的女性,与常规护理相比,接受检测的相对风险分别为4.1(95%置信区间[CI],3.8 - 4.4)和3.5(95%CI,3.2 - 3.9)。男性的相应数字分别为19.1(95%CI,16.0 - 22.8)和11.8(95%CI,9.8 - 14.2)。两种筛查策略都非常有效,但男性从直接提供上门采样试剂盒中受益最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验