Lyratzopoulos Georgios, McElduff Patrick, Heller Richard F, Hanily Margaret, Lewis Philip S
Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire Strategic Health Authority, Fulbourn, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2005 Apr 5;5:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-32.
In the UK, obesity is associated with a clear socioeconomic gradient, with individuals of lower socioeconomic status being more likely to be obese. Several previous studies, using individual measures of soecioeconomic status, have shown a more rapid increase in Body Mass Index (BMI) over time among adults of lower socioeconomic status. We conducted a study to further examine whether ecologically defined deprivation status influences within-individual BMI change during middle life, as the answer to this question can help determine optimal preventive strategies both for obesity per se, and its' associated socioeconomic disparities.
Anonymised records of participants to the Stockport population-based cardiovascular disease risk factor screening programme were analysed. Individuals aged 35-55 who had a first screening episode between 1989 and 1993, and a subsequent screening episode were included in the study. Deprivation status was defined using quintiles of the Townsend score. Mean annual BMI change by deprivation group was calculated using linear regression. Subsequently, deprivation group was included in the model as an ordinal variable, to test for trend. The modelling was repeated separately for individuals who were obese (BMI < 30) and non-obese at the time of first screening. In supplementary analysis, regression models were also adjusted for baseline BMI.
Of 21,976 women and 19,158 men initially screened, final analysis included just over half of all individuals [11,158 (50.8%) women and 9,831 (51.3%) men], due to the combined effect of loss to follow-up and incomplete BMI ascertainment. In both sexes BMI increased by 0.19 kg/m2 annually (95% Confidence Intervals 0.15-0.24 for women and 0.16-0.23 for men). All deprivation groups had similar mean annual change, and there was no evidence of a significant deprivation trend (p = 0.801, women and 0.892, men). Restricting the analysis to individuals who were non-obese at baseline did not alter the results in relation to the lack of a deprivation effect. When restricting the analysis to individuals who were obese at baseline however, the findings were suggestive of an association of BMI increase with higher deprivation group, which was further supported by a significant association when adjusting for baseline BMI.
In the study setting, the BMI of non-obese individuals aged 35-55 was increasing over time independently of deprivation status; among obese individuals a positive association with higher deprivation was found. The findings support that socioeconomic differences in mean BMI and obesity status are principally attained prior to 35 years of age. Efforts to tackle inequalities in mean BMI and obesity status should principally concentrate in earlier life periods, although there may still be scope for focusing inequality reduction efforts on obese individuals even in middle life.
在英国,肥胖与明显的社会经济梯度相关,社会经济地位较低的个体更有可能肥胖。此前的几项研究使用个体社会经济地位指标,表明社会经济地位较低的成年人随着时间推移体重指数(BMI)增长更快。我们开展了一项研究,以进一步检验从生态学角度定义的贫困状况是否会影响中年时期个体的BMI变化,因为这个问题的答案有助于确定针对肥胖本身及其相关社会经济差异的最佳预防策略。
对基于斯托克波特人群的心血管疾病风险因素筛查项目参与者的匿名记录进行分析。纳入1989年至1993年间首次筛查且随后又有一次筛查的35 - 55岁个体。使用汤森得分五分位数定义贫困状况。通过线性回归计算各贫困组的平均年度BMI变化。随后,将贫困组作为有序变量纳入模型以检验趋势。对首次筛查时肥胖(BMI < 30)和非肥胖的个体分别重复进行建模。在补充分析中,回归模型也对基线BMI进行了调整。
最初筛查的21,976名女性和19,158名男性中,由于失访和BMI数据不完全确定的综合影响,最终分析纳入了略超过一半的个体[11,158名(50.8%)女性和9,831名(51.3%)男性]。男女BMI每年均增加0.19 kg/m²(女性95%置信区间为0.15 - 0.24,男性为0.16 - 0.23)。所有贫困组的平均年度变化相似,没有证据表明存在显著的贫困趋势(女性p = 0.801,男性p = 0.892)。将分析限制在基线时非肥胖个体,并未改变缺乏贫困影响的结果。然而,当将分析限制在基线时肥胖个体时,结果提示BMI增加与较高贫困组有关,在调整基线BMI后这种关联更显著,进一步支持了这一结果。
在本研究环境中,35 - 55岁非肥胖个体的BMI随时间增加,与贫困状况无关;在肥胖个体中,发现与较高贫困程度呈正相关。研究结果支持,平均BMI和肥胖状况的社会经济差异主要在35岁之前形成。解决平均BMI和肥胖状况不平等问题的努力应主要集中在生命早期阶段,尽管即使在中年,将减少不平等的努力集中在肥胖个体上可能仍有空间。