Centre for Population Studies, Ageing and Living Conditions Programme, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Int J Equity Health. 2014 May 7;13:35. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-35.
Life course socioeconomic inequalities in heart disease, stroke and all-cause mortality are well studied in Sweden. However, few studies have sought to explain the mechanism for such associations mainly due to lack of longitudinal data with multiple measures of socioeconomic status (SES) across the life course. Given the population health concern about how socioeconomic inequality is related to poorer health, we aim to tackle obesity as one of the prime suspects that could explain the association between SES inequality and cardiovascular disease and consequently premature death. The aim of this study is to test which life course model best describes the association between socioeconomic disadvantage and obesity among 60 year old inhabitants of Västerbotten County in Northern Sweden.
A birth cohort consisting of 3340 individuals born between 1930 and 1932 was studied. Body mass index (BMI) at the age of 60 and information on socioeconomic status at three stages of life (ages 40, 50, and 60 years) was collected. Independent samples t-test was used to compare BMI between advantaged and disadvantaged groups and one-way ANOVA was used to compare BMI among eight SES trajectories. We applied a structured modeling approach to examine three different hypothesized life course SES models (accumulation, critical period, and social mobility) in relation to BMI.
We found sex differences in the way that late adulthood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with BMI among inhabitants of Northern Sweden. Our study suggests that social adversity in all stages of late adulthood is a particularly important indicator for addressing the social gradients in BMI among women in Northern Sweden and that unhealthy behaviors in terms of smoking and physical inactivity are insufficient to explain the relationships between social and lifestyle inequalities and BMI.
In order for local authorities to develop informed preventive efforts, we suggest further research to identify modifiable risk factors across the life course which could explain this health inequality.
在瑞典,人们对一生中社会经济不平等与心脏病、中风和全因死亡率之间的关系进行了广泛研究。然而,由于缺乏跨生命周期、多次测量社会经济地位(SES)的纵向数据,很少有研究试图解释这种关联的机制。鉴于人们对社会经济不平等与较差健康之间的关系感到担忧,我们旨在将肥胖作为一种主要的可疑因素来解释 SES 不平等与心血管疾病以及由此导致的过早死亡之间的关联。本研究的目的是检验生命周期模型中哪一种最能描述瑞典北部韦斯特博滕县 60 岁居民中社会经济劣势与肥胖之间的关系。
本研究以 1930 年至 1932 年间出生的 3340 人为研究对象,研究了他们在 60 岁时的体重指数(BMI)和一生中三个阶段(40 岁、50 岁和 60 岁)的社会经济地位信息。采用独立样本 t 检验比较优势组和劣势组之间的 BMI,采用单因素方差分析比较 8 个 SES 轨迹之间的 BMI。我们应用结构化建模方法,检验了与 BMI 相关的三种假设的生命周期 SES 模型(积累、关键期和社会流动)。
我们发现,在瑞典北部居民中,晚年社会经济劣势与 BMI 之间的关系存在性别差异。我们的研究表明,晚年所有阶段的社会逆境都是解决瑞典北部女性 BMI 社会梯度的一个特别重要的指标,而吸烟和身体活动不足等不健康行为不足以解释社会和生活方式不平等与 BMI 之间的关系。
为了让地方当局能够制定明智的预防措施,我们建议进一步研究,以确定生命周期内可改变的风险因素,这些因素可以解释这种健康不平等现象。