Elliott Richard
HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev. 2004 Dec;9(3):86-90.
In many countries, HIV prevalence among people who use illicit drugs is high. Yet many governments resist implementing effective HIV prevention measures, and drug users often lack access to care, treatment, and support, including for HIV/AIDS. Growing evidence indicates the dominant prohibitionist approach to illicit drugs is ineffective--and even counterproductive, blocking or undermining measures shown to reduce harms to drug users and to communities affected by open drug scenes. The growing debate over global drug control policy could shift us collectively away from the current, failed prescriptions to a more rational, pragmatic, and health-promoting framework of harm reduction. This article by Richard Elliott is an abridged version of a paper prepared for "Human Rights at the Margins: HIV/AIDS, Prisoners, Drug Users and the Law," a satellite meeting held in Bangkok on 9 July 2004, and organized by the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network and the Lawyers Collective HIV/AIDS Unit (India). The article briefly outlines the impact of these two different policy approaches, examines international law on drug control, discusses how harm reduction reflects a human rights-based approach to drugs, and assesses some strategies for reforming global policy on illicit drugs.
在许多国家,使用非法药物者中的艾滋病毒流行率很高。然而,许多政府抵制实施有效的艾滋病毒预防措施,吸毒者往往难以获得护理、治疗和支持,包括针对艾滋病毒/艾滋病的相关服务。越来越多的证据表明,对非法药物采取的主要禁止主义方法是无效的——甚至适得其反,阻碍或破坏了那些已证明能减少对吸毒者及受公开毒品场景影响社区危害的措施。关于全球毒品管制政策的争论日益激烈,这可能会使我们集体从当前失败的做法转向一个更合理、务实且促进健康的减少危害框架。理查德·埃利奥特的这篇文章是为2004年7月9日在曼谷举行的一场卫星会议“边缘地带的人权:艾滋病毒/艾滋病、囚犯、吸毒者与法律”准备的论文的精简版,该会议由加拿大艾滋病毒/艾滋病法律网络和律师集体艾滋病毒/艾滋病小组(印度)组织。文章简要概述了这两种不同政策方法的影响,审视了国际药物管制法,讨论了减少危害如何体现基于人权的毒品处理方法,并评估了一些改革全球非法药物政策的策略。