• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对人类死亡的托马斯主义理解。

A Thomistic understanding of human death.

作者信息

Eberl Jason T

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Indiana University--Purdue University Indiana, Cavganaugh Hall 331, 425 University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46202-5140, USA.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2005 Feb;19(1):29-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00423.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00423.x
PMID:15812971
Abstract

I investigate Thomas Aquinas's metaphysical account of human death, which is defined in terms of a rational soul separating from its material body. The question at hand concerns what criterion best determines when this separation occurs. Aquinas argues that a body has a rational soul only insofar as it is properly organised to support the soul's vegetative, sensitive, and rational capacities. According the 'higher-brain' concept of death, when a body can no longer provide the biological foundation necessary for the operation of conscious rational thought and volition, a substantial change occurs in which the rational soul departs and the body left behind is a 'humanoid animal' or a mere 'vegetable.' I argue that the separation of soul and body does not occur until the body ceases to function as a unified, integrated organism. A rational soul is not only the seat of a human being's rational capacities; it is also the principle of the body's sensitive and vegetative capacities. Since Aquinas defines a human being as a composite of soul and body, and not with merely the exercise of rational capacities, the determination of death requires incontrovertible evidence that the body has ceased all the operations that correspond to the soul's proper capacities. The evidence of this is the body's loss of its integrative organic unity and the criterion for determining when this loss occurs is the irreversible cessation of whole-brain functioning.

摘要

我研究托马斯·阿奎那关于人类死亡的形而上学解释,这种解释将人类死亡定义为理性灵魂与其物质身体相分离。当前的问题在于,何种标准能最佳地判定这种分离何时发生。阿奎那认为,一个身体拥有理性灵魂,仅在于它被适当地组织起来以支持灵魂的营养、感觉和理性能力。根据“高级大脑”的死亡概念,当一个身体不再能为有意识的理性思维和意志的运作提供必要的生物学基础时,就会发生一种实质性的变化,即理性灵魂离去,留下的身体是一个“类人动物”或仅仅是一个“植物人”。我认为,灵魂与身体的分离直到身体不再作为一个统一、整合的有机体发挥功能时才会发生。理性灵魂不仅是人类理性能力的所在;它也是身体感觉和营养能力之原理。由于阿奎那将人定义为灵魂与身体的复合体,而不仅仅是理性能力的行使,所以死亡的判定需要无可争议的证据,证明身体已经停止了所有与灵魂适当能力相对应的运作。这方面的证据是身体失去其整合的有机统一性,而判定这种失去何时发生的标准是全脑功能的不可逆停止。

相似文献

1
A Thomistic understanding of human death.对人类死亡的托马斯主义理解。
Bioethics. 2005 Feb;19(1):29-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00423.x.
2
A Thomistic defense of whole-brain death.对全脑死亡的托马斯主义辩护。
Linacre Q. 2015 Aug;82(3):235-50. doi: 10.1179/2050854915Y.0000000005.
3
Aquinas's account of human embryogenesis and recent interpretations.阿奎那对人类胚胎发育的论述及近期解读。
J Med Philos. 2005 Aug;30(4):379-94. doi: 10.1080/03605310591008559.
4
The metaphysics of brain death.脑死亡的形而上学
Bioethics. 1995 Apr;9(2):91-126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00305.x.
5
The metaphysics of brain death, persistent vegetative state and dementia.脑死亡、持续性植物状态和痴呆症的形而上学
Thomist. 1985 Jan;49(1):24-80. doi: 10.1353/tho.1985.0040.
6
Vegetative state and brain death: philosophical and ethical issues from a personalistic view.植物状态与脑死亡:从个人主义视角看哲学与伦理问题
NeuroRehabilitation. 2004;19(4):361-6.
7
The beginning of personhood: a Thomistic biological analysis.人格的开端:一种托马斯主义的生物学分析。
Bioethics. 2000 Apr;14(2):134-57. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00186.
8
Personhood and the persistent vegetative state.人格与持续性植物状态
Linacre Q. 1990 May;57(2):49-58. doi: 10.1080/00243639.1990.11878057.
9
Why Aquinas's Metaphysics of Gender Is Fundamentally Correct: A Response to John Finley.为何阿奎那的性别形而上学从根本上说是正确的:对约翰·芬利的回应
Linacre Q. 2020 May;87(2):198-205. doi: 10.1177/0024363919884795. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
10
Immediate animation: Thomistic principles applied to Norman Ford's objections.即时复苏:托马斯主义原则应用于诺曼·福特的反对意见。
Ethics Med. 2005 Spring;21(1):11-28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Moral Illicitness of Relying Solely on Neurological Criteria for the Determination of Death: A Catholic Response to "Brain Death".仅依靠神经学标准判定死亡的道德非法性:天主教对“脑死亡”的回应
Linacre Q. 2023 Aug;90(3):260-272. doi: 10.1177/00243639231189330. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Total Brain Death and the Integration of the Body Required of a Human Being.全脑死亡与人类所需身体的整合
J Med Philos. 2016 Jun;41(3):300-14. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhw005. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
3
A Thomistic defense of whole-brain death.对全脑死亡的托马斯主义辩护。
Linacre Q. 2015 Aug;82(3):235-50. doi: 10.1179/2050854915Y.0000000005.
4
Bioethics in a pluralistic society: bioethical methodology in lieu of moral diversity.多元社会中的生物伦理学:替代道德多样性的生物伦理方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Mar;12(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9148-9. Epub 2008 Jul 1.