Buyyounouski Mark K, Hanlon Alexandra L, Horwitz Eric M, Uzzo Robert G, Pollack Alan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.034.
The accuracy of the American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology consensus definition of biochemical failure (BF) after radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation (AD) has been questioned, because posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels typically rise after release from AD, and misclassification of BF may be made. The temporal kinetics of posttreatment PSA levels was examined to define the error in the classification of BF.
Between December 1, 1991 and April 30, 1998, 688 men with T1c-T3 NX/0 M0 prostate cancer received three-dimensional conformal RT alone (n = 586) or in combination with either short-term (STAD: 3 to 12 months, n = 82) or long-term (LTAD: 12 to 36 months, n = 20) AD. Follow-up, calculated from the end of all treatment, was >/=48 months. The mean posttreatment PSA was calculated in 3-month intervals.
The median posttreatment clinical follow-up period was 76 months (range, 48-152 months). The posttreatment PSA values from the end of all treatment for the RT+STAD-BF group showed an initial period of rise followed by a period of decline at 30 months and then a continued rise again. The decline in the mean posttreatment PSA is explained in part by stabilization in PSA level after 3 consecutive rises. Nonbiochemical failures (NBF) after RT+STAD had a relatively constant mean PSA over time of approximately 0.5 ng/mL. Unlike the RT+STAD-NBF profile, the RT+LTAD-NBF profile rose continuously and steadily to a level approaching 1 ng/mL. The RT+LTAD-BF profile rose continuously but at a slower rate over time. Nine RT+STAD-NBF patients (22%) and 2 RT+LTAD-BF (29%) patients experienced 3 consecutive rises followed by a subsequent decline and stabilization of PSA compared to 10 RT-BF patients (5%). Redistributing these misclassified patients to their respective NBF groups changed the mean posttreatment PSA profiles as follows: The RT+LTAD-BF profile rose constantly and steadily with a doubling time of approximately 16 months, and the RT+LAD-NF initially rose to a value of approximately 0.5 ng/mL, then at 36 months began to decline.
The temporal kinetics of posttreatment PSA after RT+AD and RT alone are different. The American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology definition for biochemical failure overestimates BF in 20-30% after RT+AD compared to 5% after RT alone.
放射治疗(RT)和雄激素剥夺(AD)后,美国放射肿瘤治疗学会(ASTRO)关于生化失败(BF)的共识定义的准确性受到质疑,因为治疗后前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平在AD解除后通常会升高,可能会导致BF的错误分类。研究治疗后PSA水平的时间动力学,以确定BF分类中的误差。
1991年12月1日至1998年4月30日期间,688例T1c-T3 NX/0 M0前列腺癌男性患者单独接受三维适形放疗(n = 586),或联合短期(STAD:3至12个月,n = 82)或长期(LTAD:12至36个月,n = 20)AD治疗。从所有治疗结束开始计算随访时间≥48个月。以3个月为间隔计算治疗后的平均PSA水平。
治疗后临床随访的中位时间为76个月(范围48-152个月)。RT+STAD-BF组从所有治疗结束后的治疗后PSA值显示,最初有一个上升期,然后在30个月时有一个下降期,之后又持续上升。治疗后平均PSA的下降部分是由于连续3次上升后PSA水平稳定。RT+STAD后的非生化失败(NBF)患者的平均PSA随时间相对稳定,约为0.5 ng/mL。与RT+STAD-NBF曲线不同,RT+LTAD-NBF曲线持续稳定上升至接近1 ng/mL的水平。RT+LTAD-BF曲线持续上升,但随时间上升速度较慢。9例RT+STAD-NBF患者(22%)和2例RT+LTAD-BF患者(29%)经历了连续3次上升,随后PSA下降并稳定,而10例RT-BF患者(5%)也有此情况。将这些错误分类的患者重新分配到各自的NBF组后,治疗后的平均PSA曲线变化如下:RT+LTAD-BF曲线持续稳定上升,倍增时间约为16个月,RT+LAD-NF最初上升至约0.5 ng/mL,然后在36个月开始下降。
RT+AD和单纯RT后治疗后PSA的时间动力学不同。与单纯RT后5%相比,ASTRO关于生化失败的定义在RT+AD后高估BF 20%-30%。