Blot François, Melot Christian
Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 Rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France.
Chest. 2005 Apr;127(4):1347-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.4.1347.
To investigate the current practice of tracheostomy in French ICUs, focusing on the frequency, timing, indications, and techniques.
A retrospective study.
A questionnaire was sent to all ICUs included in the national registry of the Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise.
All ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) during the year preceding the survey (excluding noninvasive ventilation) were covered by the questionnaire.
None.
Of the 708 ICUs invited to participate, 152 (21.5%) answered the questionnaire. Overall, 35,322 patients (median, 212 patients per unit; interquartile range [IQR], 148 to 329 patients) had received MV, including one fourth of patients for > 7 days. A median of 7.2% of patients (IQR, 2.9 to 11.1%) had undergone a tracheostomy. The most frequently reported indications for tracheostomy were prolonged MV (95%, after a median of 20 days) and failure of extubation (48%). An indication for "early" tracheostomy (ie, < 3 weeks) was considered in 68% of the ICUs, after a median time of 7 days. Physicians thought that performing tracheostomy would facilitate weaning from MV and early oral nutrition, and would improve overall patient comfort. The main disadvantages listed were tracheal complications, the aggressiveness of the procedure, and the risk of infection. Surgical techniques largely remained preferred compared to percutaneous techniques.
There is much heterogeneity in the reported practices of tracheostomy in French ICUs. Three fourths of physicians considered that a randomized study comparing prolonged translaryngeal intubation and early tracheostomy in patients expected to receive prolonged MV would be necessary to clarify those issues.
调查法国重症监护病房(ICU)目前气管切开术的应用情况,重点关注其频率、时机、适应证和技术。
一项回顾性研究。
向法国复苏协会国家登记册中纳入的所有ICU发送了一份问卷。
问卷涵盖了调查前一年接受机械通气(MV)的所有ICU患者(不包括无创通气)。
无。
在受邀参与的708个ICU中,152个(21.5%)回复了问卷。总体而言,35322例患者(中位数为每个单位212例患者;四分位间距[IQR]为148至329例患者)接受了MV,其中四分之一的患者MV时间超过7天。气管切开术的患者中位数为7.2%(IQR为2.9%至11.1%)。最常报告的气管切开术适应证是长时间MV(95%,中位数为20天)和拔管失败(48%)。68%的ICU考虑了“早期”气管切开术(即<3周)的适应证,中位时间为7天。医生们认为进行气管切开术将有助于MV撤机和早期经口营养,并会提高患者的总体舒适度。列出的主要缺点是气管并发症、操作的侵入性和感染风险。与经皮技术相比,手术技术在很大程度上仍然更受青睐。
法国ICU报告的气管切开术应用情况存在很大异质性。四分之三的医生认为,有必要进行一项随机研究来比较预期接受长时间MV的患者进行长时间经喉插管和早期气管切开术,以阐明这些问题。