Uysal Tancan, Sari Zafer, Basciftci Faruk Ayhan, Memili Badel
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):208-13. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0204:ITSDAM>2.0.CO;2.
The aims of this study were to identify the possible sex differences in tooth size ratios between males and females, to determine whether there is a difference in the incidence of tooth size discrepancies for both the anterior and overall ratios when comparing with Angle Class I; Class II, division 1; Class II, division 2; and Class III malocclusion groups, to compare the tooth size ratios of different malocclusion groups with the anterior and overall tooth size ratios of 150 untreated normal occlusion subjects. In addition, the aim was to determine the percentage of tooth size discrepancies outside 2 SD from Bolton means for tooth ratios present in each malocclusion group and in the overall sample of this study. This study consisted of 150 subjects who served as the normal occlusion group and 560 patients who showed four different malocclusion characteristics (Angle Class I; Class II, division 1; Class II, division 2; and Class III). Tooth size measurements were performed on the models of normal occlusion and pretreatment models. For statistical evaluation, Student's t-test, analysis of variance and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference tests were performed. A significant sex difference was found only in the overall ratio for normal occlusion subjects (P < .001). All malocclusion groups showed statistically significant higher overall ratios than the normal occlusion group (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences among malocclusion groups; however, there were a large number of patients within each group who had discrepancies greater than 2 SD from the mean. Further investigations are needed to explain the probable racial differences and relationships between malocclusion and tooth size measurements.
本研究的目的是确定男性和女性之间牙齿大小比例可能存在的性别差异;在与安氏Ⅰ类、安氏Ⅱ类1分类、安氏Ⅱ类2分类和安氏Ⅲ类错牙合畸形组进行比较时,确定前牙和整体比例的牙齿大小差异发生率是否存在差异;将不同错牙合畸形组的牙齿大小比例与150名未经治疗的正常牙合受试者的前牙和整体牙齿大小比例进行比较。此外,目的是确定每个错牙合畸形组以及本研究总体样本中牙齿比例超出博尔顿均值2个标准差的牙齿大小差异百分比。本研究包括150名作为正常牙合组的受试者和560名表现出四种不同错牙合畸形特征(安氏Ⅰ类、安氏Ⅱ类1分类、安氏Ⅱ类2分类和安氏Ⅲ类)的患者。对正常牙合模型和治疗前模型进行牙齿大小测量。为进行统计学评估,采用了学生t检验、方差分析和Tukey真实显著差异检验。仅在正常牙合受试者的整体比例中发现了显著的性别差异(P <.001)。所有错牙合畸形组的整体比例均显著高于正常牙合组(P <.001)。错牙合畸形组之间无统计学显著差异;然而,每组中都有大量患者的差异大于均值的2个标准差。需要进一步研究来解释可能的种族差异以及错牙合畸形与牙齿大小测量之间的关系。